Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Don't check for NULL divisor in fixpt code

2025-05-05 Thread Alex Hung
Reviewed-by: Alex Hung On 4/28/25 15:34, Harry Wentland wrote: [Why] We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it. This check does nothing other than throw a warning. It does confuse static checkers though: See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371 [How] Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and SPL va

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Don't check for NULL divisor in fixpt code

2025-04-29 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 5:43 PM Harry Wentland wrote: > > [Why] > We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it. > This check does nothing other than throw a warning. > It does confuse static checkers though: > See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371 > > [How] > Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and S

[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Don't check for NULL divisor in fixpt code

2025-04-28 Thread Harry Wentland
[Why] We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it. This check does nothing other than throw a warning. It does confuse static checkers though: See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371 [How] Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and SPL variants. Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Leo