Reviewed-by: Alex Hung
On 4/28/25 15:34, Harry Wentland wrote:
[Why]
We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it.
This check does nothing other than throw a warning.
It does confuse static checkers though:
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371
[How]
Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and SPL va
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 5:43 PM Harry Wentland wrote:
>
> [Why]
> We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it.
> This check does nothing other than throw a warning.
> It does confuse static checkers though:
> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371
>
> [How]
> Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and S
[Why]
We check for a NULL divisor but don't act on it.
This check does nothing other than throw a warning.
It does confuse static checkers though:
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/4/26/371
[How]
Drop the ASSERTs in both DC and SPL variants.
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland
Cc: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Leo