Am Mittwoch, dem 29.01.2025 um 11:58 +0100 schrieb Christian König:
> Even the kerneldoc says that with a zero timeout the function should not
> wait for anything, but still return 1 to indicate that the fences are
> signaled now.
>
> Unfortunately that isn't what was implemented, instead of only
Even the kerneldoc says that with a zero timeout the function should not
wait for anything, but still return 1 to indicate that the fences are
signaled now.
Unfortunately that isn't what was implemented, instead of only returning
1 we also waited for at least one jiffies.
Fix that by adjusting th
