From: Guangming Cao
On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 23:11 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Christian K鰊ig wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 19.10.21 um 14:41 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:23:45PM +0800,
> > > guangming@mediatek.com wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.10.21 um 14:41 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:23:45PM +0800, guangming@mediatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Guangming Cao
> > >
> > > Since there is no mandatory inspection for attachments in dma_
Am 19.10.21 um 14:41 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:23:45PM +0800, guangming@mediatek.com wrote:
From: Guangming Cao
Since there is no mandatory inspection for attachments in dma_buf_release.
There will be a case that dma_buf already released but attachment is still
i
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:23:45PM +0800, guangming@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Guangming Cao
>
> Since there is no mandatory inspection for attachments in dma_buf_release.
> There will be a case that dma_buf already released but attachment is still
> in use, which can points to the dmabuf, a
From: Guangming Cao
Since there is no mandatory inspection for attachments in dma_buf_release.
There will be a case that dma_buf already released but attachment is still
in use, which can points to the dmabuf, and it maybe cause
some unexpected issues.
With IOMMU, when this cases occurs, there w
