Am 24.08.19 um 21:12 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Quoting Koenig, Christian (2019-08-24 20:04:43)
>> Am 24.08.19 um 15:58 schrieb Chris Wilson:
>>> In order to allow dma-fence-array as a generic container for fences, we
>>> need to allow for it to contain other dma-fence-arrays. By giving each
>>> dma-f
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc5 next-20190823]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit
Quoting Koenig, Christian (2019-08-24 20:04:43)
> Am 24.08.19 um 15:58 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> > In order to allow dma-fence-array as a generic container for fences, we
> > need to allow for it to contain other dma-fence-arrays. By giving each
> > dma-fence-array construction their own lockclass, w
Am 24.08.19 um 15:58 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> In order to allow dma-fence-array as a generic container for fences, we
> need to allow for it to contain other dma-fence-arrays. By giving each
> dma-fence-array construction their own lockclass, we allow different
> types of dma-fence-array to nest, bu
In order to allow dma-fence-array as a generic container for fences, we
need to allow for it to contain other dma-fence-arrays. By giving each
dma-fence-array construction their own lockclass, we allow different
types of dma-fence-array to nest, but still do not allow on class of
dma-fence-array to
