On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
I've attached two patches that make it work on my system, and fix the war
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like thie idea,
/home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-2.6/drivers/base/dma-buf.c: In function
?dma_buf_describe?:
/home/airlied/devel/kern
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
I've attached two patches that make it work on my system, and fix the war
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like thie idea,
/home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-2.6/drivers/base/dma-buf.c: In function
‘dma_buf_describe’:
/home/airlied/devel/kern
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.semwal at ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
On 14 December 2012 16:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Missed one ...
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> > + list_for_each_entry(attach_obj, &buf_obj->attachments,
> > node) {
> > + seq_printf(s, "\t\t");
> > +
> > + seq_printf(
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.semwal at ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be d
On 17 December 2012 14:25, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Apologies for re-sending, since the gmail ui 'decided' to set some
formatting options by default!
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> > From: Sumit Semwal
>
On 14 December 2012 16:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Missed one ...
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> > + list_for_each_entry(attach_obj, &buf_obj->attachments,
> > node) {
> > + seq_printf(s, "\t\t");
> > +
> > + seq_printf(
Hi Maarten,
On 14 December 2012 17:27, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> > From: Sumit Semwal
> >
> > Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> > about the dma-buf buffers.
> >
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.semwal at ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> ++
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.semwal at ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like th
From: Sumit Semwal
Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
about the dma-buf buffers.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149 +++
include/linux/dma-buf.h |6 +-
2 files changed, 154 insertions(+),
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.semwal at ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be
Missed one ...
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> + list_for_each_entry(attach_obj, &buf_obj->attachments, node) {
> + seq_printf(s, "\t\t");
> +
> + seq_printf(s, "%s\n", attach_obj->dev->init_name);
> + att
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
Looks line, only nitpick is that we have no idea who exported a given
buffer. So what about adding a n
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.semwal at ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a fre
Op 14-12-12 15:11, Rob Clark schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>>
>>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>>
>> I like the i
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
>> From: Sumit Semwal
>>
>> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
>> about the dma-buf buffers.
>>
> I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free m
Op 14-12-12 10:36, sumit.sem...@ti.com schreef:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
I like the idea, I don't know if it could be done in a free manner, but for
bonus points
could we also have the dma-buf fd be ob
Missed one ...
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> + list_for_each_entry(attach_obj, &buf_obj->attachments, node) {
> + seq_printf(s, "\t\t");
> +
> + seq_printf(s, "%s\n", attach_obj->dev->init_name);
> + att
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
Looks line, only nitpick is that we have no idea who exported a given
buffer. So what about adding a n
From: Sumit Semwal
Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
about the dma-buf buffers.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149 +++
include/linux/dma-buf.h |6 +-
2 files changed, 154 insertions(+),
24 matches
Mail list logo