On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:18PM -0700, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> When we merge several fences, if all of them are signaled already, we
> still keep one of them. So instead of using add_fence(), which will not
> increase the refcount of signaled fences, we should explicitly call
> fence_get() fo
Hi Rafael,
2016-09-14 Rafael Antognolli :
> When we merge several fences, if all of them are signaled already, we
> still keep one of them. So instead of using add_fence(), which will not
> increase the refcount of signaled fences, we should explicitly call
> fence_get() for the fence we are keep
When we merge several fences, if all of them are signaled already, we
still keep one of them. So instead of using add_fence(), which will not
increase the refcount of signaled fences, we should explicitly call
fence_get() for the fence we are keeping.
This patch fixes a kernel panic that can be tr