On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> While typing these I think doing an s/component_master/aggregate/
> would be useful:
> - it's shorter :-)
> - I think component/aggregate is much more meaningful naming than
> component/puppetmaster or something like that. At least to my
>
While typing these I think doing an s/component_master/aggregate/
would be useful:
- it's shorter :-)
- I think component/aggregate is much more meaningful naming than
component/puppetmaster or something like that. At least to my
English ear "aggregate" emphasizes much more the "assemble a pile
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:49:02PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:21:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Someone owes me a beer ...
>
> I find that deeply offensive - it is clearly directed at me personally
> as author of the component helper.
>
> There
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:21:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Someone owes me a beer ...
I find that deeply offensive - it is clearly directed at me personally
as author of the component helper.
There are double-standards in the kernel ecosystem with respect to
documentation - there are entire
Someone owes me a beer ...
While typing these I think doing an s/component_master/aggregate/
would be useful:
- it's shorter :-)
- I think component/aggregate is much more meaningful naming than
component/puppetmaster or something like that. At least to my
English ear "aggregate" emphasizes mu
