On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
> support for it which removes another user of the deprecated
> pwm_request() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 12
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:14:01AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:21:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
> > > support for it
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:14:01AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:21:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
> > support for it which removes another user of the deprecated
> > pwm_request() function.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:21:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
> support for it which removes another user of the deprecated
> pwm_request() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
I have to take the "no in-tree user
There is no in-tree user left which relies on legacy probing. So drop
support for it which removes another user of the deprecated
pwm_request() function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 12
include/linux/pwm_backlight.h| 1 -
2 files chang
