On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:27 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > The code in the Corgi backlight driver can be considerably
> > simplified by moving to GPIO descriptors and lookup tables
> > from the board files instead of passing GPIO numbers using
> > the old AP
On Tue, 03 Dec 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The code in the Corgi backlight driver can be considerably
> simplified by moving to GPIO descriptors and lookup tables
> from the board files instead of passing GPIO numbers using
> the old API.
>
> Make sure to encode inversion semantics for the Akita
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:24 PM Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > Linus Walleij writes:
> > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:06 PM Robert Jarzmik
> > > wrote:
> > >> Linus Walleij writes:
>
> > > So it will theoretically "spi0.1"
> > >
> > > Beware about bugs in
Linus Walleij writes:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:06 PM Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> Linus Walleij writes:
>> > @@ -525,13 +525,33 @@ static void spitz_bl_kick_battery(void)
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table spitz_lcdcon_gpio_table = {
>> > + .dev_id = "spi0.1",
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:24 PM Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Linus Walleij writes:
> > On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:06 PM Robert Jarzmik
> > wrote:
> >> Linus Walleij writes:
> > So it will theoretically "spi0.1"
> >
> > Beware about bugs in the above interpreter because it is
> > just my brain.
>
> W
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:06 PM Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Linus Walleij writes:
> > @@ -525,13 +525,33 @@ static void spitz_bl_kick_battery(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table spitz_lcdcon_gpio_table = {
> > + .dev_id = "spi0.1",
> How do you know the correct devi
Linus Walleij writes:
Hi Linus,
> @@ -525,13 +525,33 @@ static void spitz_bl_kick_battery(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table spitz_lcdcon_gpio_table = {
> + .dev_id = "spi0.1",
How do you know the correct device name is "spi0.1" ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
___
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:31:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The code in the Corgi backlight driver can be considerably
> simplified by moving to GPIO descriptors and lookup tables
> from the board files instead of passing GPIO numbers using
> the old API.
>
> Make sure to encode inversion sem
The code in the Corgi backlight driver can be considerably
simplified by moving to GPIO descriptors and lookup tables
from the board files instead of passing GPIO numbers using
the old API.
Make sure to encode inversion semantics for the Akita and
Spitz platforms inside the GPIO lookup table and d
