On 20/02/2024 22:23, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.02.2024 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
>> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
>> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
>>
On 20.02.2024 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
>
> Fixes: a06a2f12f9e2 ("arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:31:04 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
> orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
> the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] a
The patch adding Type-C support for sm6115 was misapplied. All the
orientation switch configuration ended up at the UFS PHY node instead of
the USB PHY node. Move the data bits to the correct place.
Fixes: a06a2f12f9e2 ("arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4210-rb2: enable USB-C port
handling")
Signed-off-by: D