On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tormod Volden
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
From: Tormod Volden
Some cards repo
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
>> From: Tormod Volden
>>
>> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
>> should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
>
> Have you t
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tormod Volden
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
>>> From: Tormod Volden
>>>
>>> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
>>> should sup
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
> From: Tormod Volden
>
> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
> should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
Have you tested it on other hardware besides your KN133?
>
> Otherwise a reque
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tormod Volden wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
From: Tormod Volden
Some cards report
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tormod Volden wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
>>> From: Tormod Volden
>>>
>>> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
>>> should supp
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
>> From: Tormod Volden
>>
>> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
>> should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
>
> Have you t
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
> From: Tormod Volden
>
> Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
> should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
Have you tested it on other hardware besides your KN133?
>
> Otherwise a reque
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Corbin Simpson
wrote:
> Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
It will allow the user to override possibly safer default settings. If
a user has specified, say, 2x in his xorg.conf and this was not
honored because the card only reported 4x, this pa
From: Tormod Volden
Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
Otherwise a requested 1x or 2x rate will result in 0 being set:
agpgart-via :00:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 0x mode
For instance ProSavage K
Thanks for writing it!
Reviewed-by: Corbin Simpson
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Nov 6, 2011 10:39 AM, "Tormod Volden" wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Corbin Simpson
> wrote:
> > Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
>
> It will allow the user
Thanks for writing it!
Reviewed-by: Corbin Simpson
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Nov 6, 2011 10:39 AM, "Tormod Volden" wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Corbin Simpson
> wrote:
> > Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
>
> It will allow the user
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Corbin Simpson
wrote:
> Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
It will allow the user to override possibly safer default settings. If
a user has specified, say, 2x in his xorg.conf and this was not
honored because the card only reported 4x, this pa
Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
Is there any reason to use the not-so-magic numbers instead of the named
constants?
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Nov 6, 2011 7:03 AM, "Tormod Volden" wrote:
> From: Tormod Volden
>
> Some cards report that they supp
Trusting the spec worries me; could this break anybody?
Is there any reason to use the not-so-magic numbers instead of the named
constants?
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Nov 6, 2011 7:03 AM, "Tormod Volden" wrote:
> From: Tormod Volden
>
> Some cards report that they supp
From: Tormod Volden
Some cards report that they support only 4x, in which case they
should support 2x and 1x as well, according to the AGP spec.
Otherwise a requested 1x or 2x rate will result in 0 being set:
agpgart-via :00:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 0x mode
For instance ProSavage K
16 matches
Mail list logo
