Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-09 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-02-09 um 9:08 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:15 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: >> Am 2021-02-09 um 1:37 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:13 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen >>> wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:40 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: > Am

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:15 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: > Am 2021-02-09 um 1:37 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:13 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:40 PM Felix Kuehling > >> wrote: > >>> Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-09 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-02-09 um 1:37 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:13 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:40 PM Felix Kuehling >> wrote: >>> Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > Am 2021-01-27

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:13 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:40 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: > > > > Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > > > Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > >> Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > > >>> Am 27

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-08 Thread Bas Nieuwenhuizen
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:40 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: > > Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > > Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > >> Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > >>> Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Op 27-01-2021 om 01:2

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-02-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
Back from vacations. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 04:46:55PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > Am 28.01.21 um 16:39 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > > > Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > > > Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-28 Thread Christian König
Am 28.01.21 um 16:39 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: Am

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-28 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-01-28 um 2:39 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: >> Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: >>> Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: > Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-27 Thread Christian König
Am 27.01.21 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: Recently there was a fairly long thread about recor

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-27 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-01-27 um 7:16 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: >>> Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page faults, how

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-27 Thread Christian König
Am 27.01.21 um 13:11 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. While the discussion

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-27 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-01-2021 om 01:22 schreef Felix Kuehling: > Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: >> Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page >> faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. >> >> While the discussion is still fresh I figured good time to

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-26 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page > faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. > > While the discussion is still fresh I figured good time to try and > document the conclusions a bit. > > Referen

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-22 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-01-21 um 2:40 p.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page > faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. > > While the discussion is still fresh I figured good time to try and > document the conclusions a bit. Thank you D

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:24 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 22.01.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 21.01.21 um 20:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >>> Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page > >>>

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-22 Thread Christian König
Am 22.01.21 um 14:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christian König wrote: Am 21.01.21 um 20:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter: Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. While the discussion

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 21.01.21 um 20:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page > > faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. > > > > While the discussion is still fresh I figured good

Re: [PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-22 Thread Christian König
Am 21.01.21 um 20:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter: Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. While the discussion is still fresh I figured good time to try and document the conclusions a bit. References: https://na

[PATCH] RFC: dma-fence: Document recoverable page fault implications

2021-01-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
Recently there was a fairly long thread about recoreable hardware page faults, how they can deadlock, and what to do about that. While the discussion is still fresh I figured good time to try and document the conclusions a bit. References: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210107030127.20393-1