On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:31:45AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:18:23 +
> "Yeh, Sinclair" wrote:
>
> > > The below seems fine, but I wonder if we could make this one cause an
> > > error to be returned later where we can, rather than silently ignoring.
> > > I'm not s
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:18:23 +
"Yeh, Sinclair" wrote:
> > The below seems fine, but I wonder if we could make this one cause an
> > error to be returned later where we can, rather than silently ignoring.
> > I'm not sure where or how, though.
>
> Would it make sense to change wl_egl_window_r
> The below seems fine, but I wonder if we could make this one cause an
> error to be returned later where we can, rather than silently ignoring.
> I'm not sure where or how, though.
Would it make sense to change wl_egl_window_resize() so that it return a
value? Either that, or it should be docum
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:21:11 -0800
Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> It is illegal to create or resize a window to zero (or negative) width
> and/or height. This patch prevents such a request from happening.
> ---
> src/egl/wayland/wayland-egl/wayland-egl.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
It is illegal to create or resize a window to zero (or negative) width
and/or height. This patch prevents such a request from happening.
---
src/egl/wayland/wayland-egl/wayland-egl.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/egl/wayland/wayland-egl/wayland-egl.c
b/src/egl/way