[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-28 Thread Marius Gröger
On 28.10.2010 11:12, wrote sam tygier: > Without this patch i get no display (X or VT) on myEIZO S2242W monitor > when using KMS > > This was discussed back in september, this is the second version of the > patch based on ajax's comments. i have opened a bug for the issue: > https://bugs.freedeskto

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-28 Thread sam tygier
Sam --- From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Tygier Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered invalid. Instead just drop the in

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-28 Thread Marius Gröger
On 28.10.2010 11:12, wrote sam tygier: Without this patch i get no display (X or VT) on myEIZO S2242W monitor when using KMS This was discussed back in september, this is the second version of the patch based on ajax's comments. i have opened a bug for the issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/sho

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-28 Thread sam tygier
Sam --- From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Tygier Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered invalid. Instead just drop the in

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-01 Thread Sam Tygier
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote: > Yeah, I hate to just drop extension blocks, but it's better than the > alternative. They're optional for a reason I suppose. > For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extension block is all zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VT

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-10-01 Thread Sam Tygier
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote: Yeah, I hate to just drop extension blocks, but it's better than the alternative. They're optional for a reason I suppose. For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extension block is all zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VTs. I suspe

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-23 Thread Sam Tygier
valid_extensions is needed to keep track of how many valid extensions have been retrieved. The skipping, and fixing code was moved out from the carp block. --- From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Tygier Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100 Subject: [

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-23 Thread Sam Tygier
t valid_extensions is needed to keep track of how many valid extensions have been retrieved. The skipping, and fixing code was moved out from the carp block. --- From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Tygier Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100 Subjec

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Sam Tygier
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: >> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be >> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the >> valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > >> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be > >> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the >

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be > considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the > valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have > extensions, and update the checksum.

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Sam Tygier
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have ex

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > >> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be > >> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the >

Re: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be > considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the > valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have > extensions, and update the checksum.

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-21 Thread Sam Tygier
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have extensions, and update the checksum. For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extens

[PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions

2010-09-21 Thread Sam Tygier
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have extensions, and update the checksum. For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the exten