On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> > have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> > Part of the conve
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:25:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> > > have the drm_mm_nod
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:25:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> > > have the drm_mm_nod
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> > have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> > Part of the conve
Hi
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
> will break a bunch
Hi
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
> will break a bunch
For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
will break a bunch of code, but amongst them are 2 callers of
drm_mm_create_block(),
For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
will break a bunch of code, but amongst them are 2 callers of
drm_mm_create_block(),