On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:25:05PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:53:44PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > On 04/10/2019 20:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > >> From: Colin Ian King
> > >>
> > >> The pointer disab
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:53:44PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 04/10/2019 20:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> >> From: Colin Ian King
> >>
> >> The pointer disable_done is being initialized with a value that
> >> is never read and is be
On 04/10/2019 20:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The pointer disable_done is being initialized with a value that
>> is never read and is being re-assigned a little later on. The
>> assignment is redundant and hence
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The pointer disable_done is being initialized with a value that
> is never read and is being re-assigned a little later on. The
> assignment is redundant and hence can be removed.
Not really true, isn't it? Th
From: Colin Ian King
The pointer disable_done is being initialized with a value that
is never read and is being re-assigned a little later on. The
assignment is redundant and hence can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/displa
