[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-03 Thread Zhang Rui
On ?, 2012-08-02 at 21:45 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote: > > On ?, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > >> > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> >

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-03 Thread Zhang Rui
On ?, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific event

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-03 Thread Zhang Rui
On 四, 2012-08-02 at 21:45 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote: > > On 四, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > >> > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> >

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-03 Thread Zhang Rui
On 四, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific event

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-02 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote: > On ?, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: >> > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: >> > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event >> > > ACP

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-02 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote: > On 四, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: >> > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: >> > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event >> > > ACP

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWI

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-02 Thread Zhang Rui
On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWI

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread joeyli
? ??2012-08-01 ? 15:49 +0200?Luca Tettamanti ??? > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the mode s

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread Zhang Rui
On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread joeyli
於 三,2012-08-01 於 15:49 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到: > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the mode s

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread Luca Tettamanti
AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the userspace because the user did not press the mode switch key (the spurious keypress confuses the DE which us

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the

Re: [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such > cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the > userspace because the user did not press the

[PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events

2012-08-01 Thread Luca Tettamanti
AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the userspace because the user did not press the mode switch key (the spurious keypress confuses the DE which us