On 24 Jun 05:06 PM, Darren Etheridge wrote:
>
> On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> >The TI tilcdc driver is designed with a notion of submodules. Currently,
> >at unload time, these submodules are iterated and destroyed.
> >
> >Now that the tilcdc remove order is fixed, this can be ha
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:06:24PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote:
> Guido,
>
> On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> >The TI tilcdc driver is designed with a notion of submodules. Currently,
> >at unload time, these submodules are iterated and destroyed.
> >
> >Now that the tilcdc remove
Guido,
On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote:
> The TI tilcdc driver is designed with a notion of submodules. Currently,
> at unload time, these submodules are iterated and destroyed.
>
> Now that the tilcdc remove order is fixed, this can be handled perfectly
I am not sure I understand th
The TI tilcdc driver is designed with a notion of submodules. Currently,
at unload time, these submodules are iterated and destroyed.
Now that the tilcdc remove order is fixed, this can be handled perfectly
by the kernel using the device infrastructure, since each submodule
is a kernel driver itse
