Re: [PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-28 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: Hi All, I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html The result at that time was that EDID data sh

[PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 06:16:12AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: > On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the > >devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: > > > >https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linu

[PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi All, I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html The result at that time was that EDID data should be considered to use as this is a forma

Re: [PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 06:16:12AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: > On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the > >devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: > > > >https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linu

[PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-27 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the > devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html > > The result at that time was that E

[PATCH, RFC] displaymodes in devicetree

2012-06-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi All, I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html The result at that time was that EDID data should be considered to use as this is a forma