On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html
The result at that time was that EDID data sh
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 06:16:12AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
> >devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
> >
> >https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linu
Hi All,
I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html
The result at that time was that EDID data should be considered to use
as this is a forma
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 06:16:12AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
> >devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
> >
> >https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linu
On 6/27/2012 2:43 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
> devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
>
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html
>
> The result at that time was that E
Hi All,
I'd like to have a possibility to describe fixed display modes in the
devicetree. This topic has been discussed before here:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-February/080683.html
The result at that time was that EDID data should be considered to use
as this is a forma