Op 10-12-12 17:39, Emil Velikov schreef:
> On 21/11/12 13:15, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> move_notify is called by ttm after the the object is idle and about
>> to be destroyed. Clean up the vm list properly in that case.
>>
>> This is not a problem right now, since the list should already be
>> em
On 21/11/12 13:15, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> move_notify is called by ttm after the the object is idle and about
> to be destroyed. Clean up the vm list properly in that case.
>
> This is not a problem right now, since the list should already be
> empty, but if it wasn't empty, vm_put was not cal
Op 10-12-12 17:39, Emil Velikov schreef:
> On 21/11/12 13:15, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> move_notify is called by ttm after the the object is idle and about
>> to be destroyed. Clean up the vm list properly in that case.
>>
>> This is not a problem right now, since the list should already be
>> em
On 21/11/12 13:15, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> move_notify is called by ttm after the the object is idle and about
> to be destroyed. Clean up the vm list properly in that case.
>
> This is not a problem right now, since the list should already be
> empty, but if it wasn't empty, vm_put was not cal