Hi Jeffy,
Am 10.08.22 um 06:16 schrieb Chen Jeffy:
Hi Christian,
On 8/9 星期二 18:18, Christian König wrote:
Hi Jeffy,
[SNIP]
Maybe cache the latest returned handle in the obj(after
drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle), and clear it when that handle been
deleted in drm_gem_handle_delete()?
That won't
Hi Christian,
On 8/9 星期二 18:18, Christian König wrote:
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 12:02 schrieb Chen Jeffy:
Hi Christian,
On 8/9 星期二 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 09:55 schrieb Christian König:
[SNIP]
So we are allowing GEM object to have multiple handles, and G
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 12:02 schrieb Chen Jeffy:
Hi Christian,
On 8/9 星期二 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 09:55 schrieb Christian König:
[SNIP]
So we are allowing GEM object to have multiple handles, and GEM
object could have at most one dma-buf, doesn't that m
Hi Christian,
On 8/9 星期二 17:08, Christian König wrote:
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 09:55 schrieb Christian König:
[SNIP]
So we are allowing GEM object to have multiple handles, and GEM
object could have at most one dma-buf, doesn't that means that
dma-buf could map to multiple handles?
N
Hi Jeffy,
Am 09.08.22 um 09:55 schrieb Christian König:
[SNIP]
So we are allowing GEM object to have multiple handles, and GEM
object could have at most one dma-buf, doesn't that means that
dma-buf could map to multiple handles?
No, at least not for the same GEM file private. That's the
