[Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver

2012-05-24 Thread Tom Cooksey
top.org > Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:55:06AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > * Define a new x-server sub-module interface to allow a seperate > > > > .so 2D driver to be loaded (this is the approa

RE: [Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver

2012-05-24 Thread Tom Cooksey
ject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:55:06AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > * Define a new x-server sub-module interface to allow a seperate > > > > .so 2D driver to be loaded (this is the approach the

[Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:55:06AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > * Define a new x-server sub-module interface to allow a seperate .so 2D > > driver to be loaded (this is the approach the current OMAP DDX uses). > > This seems the sanest. Or go the intel glamour route and stitch together a somewha

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] New "xf86-video-armsoc" DDX driver

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:55:06AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > * Define a new x-server sub-module interface to allow a seperate .so 2D > > driver to be loaded (this is the approach the current OMAP DDX uses). > > This seems the sanest. Or go the intel glamour route and stitch together a somewha