[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-26 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Hence for both patches: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter >>> >>> Yeah I'm with Daniel, I like this one, I can definitely

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-25 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Hence for both patches: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter >>> >>> Yeah I'm with Daniel, I like this one, I can definitely

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-23 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >> implement some basic use-cases and start fleshing out the integration with >> various subsyste

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-23 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >>> >>> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >>> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >>> implement some basic use-cases

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-23 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >>> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >>> implement some basic use-cases a

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-23 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >>> >>> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >>> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >>> implement some basic use-cases

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-23 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >> implement some basic use-cases and start fleshing out the integration with >> various subsyste

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-22 Thread Semwal, Sumit
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> I think this is a really good v1 version of dma_buf. It contains all the >>> required bits (with well-specified semantics in the doc patch) to >>> implement some basic use-cases a

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-20 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> This is RFC v3 for DMA buffer sharing mechanism - changes from v2 are in the >> changelog below. >> >> Various subsystems - V4L2, GPU-accessors, DRI to name a few - have felt the >> need to have a common mechanism to share memory buffers across different >> devices - ARM, video hardware, GPU.

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-20 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> This is RFC v3 for DMA buffer sharing mechanism - changes from v2 are in the >>> changelog below. >>> >>> Various subsystems - V4L2, GPU-accessors, DRI to name a few - have felt the >>> need to have a common mechanism to share memory buff

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-20 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> This is RFC v3 for DMA buffer sharing mechanism - changes from v2 are in the >>> changelog below. >>> >>> Various subsystems - V4L2, GPU-accessors, DRI to name a few - have felt the >>> need to have a common mechanism to share memory buff

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism

2011-12-20 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> This is RFC v3 for DMA buffer sharing mechanism - changes from v2 are in the >> changelog below. >> >> Various subsystems - V4L2, GPU-accessors, DRI to name a few - have felt the >> need to have a common mechanism to share memory buffers across different >> devices - ARM, video hardware, GPU.