Hi Sumit,
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:56:52 Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Summit,
> >
> > Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but
> > I still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree wit
Hi Sumit,
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:56:52 Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Summit,
> >
> > Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but
> > I still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree wit
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Summit,
>
> Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but I
> still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree with them.
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your review; apologies for being late in replyin
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Summit,
>
> Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but I
> still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree with them.
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your review; apologies for being late in replyin
Hi Summit,
Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but I
still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree with them.
On Monday 26 December 2011 10:23:15 Sumit Semwal wrote:
> This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
>
> A new
Hi Summit,
Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but I
still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree with them.
On Monday 26 December 2011 10:23:15 Sumit Semwal wrote:
> This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
>
> A new
