[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm: Move ->old_fb from crtc to plane

2014-07-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:46:11PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:19PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Atomic implemenations for legacy ioctls must be able to drop locks. > > Which doesn't cause havoc since we only do that while constructing > > the new state, so no driver

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm: Move ->old_fb from crtc to plane

2014-07-30 Thread Dave Airlie
On 30 July 2014 07:32, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Atomic implemenations for legacy ioctls must be able to drop locks. > Which doesn't cause havoc since we only do that while constructing > the new state, so no driver or hardware state change has happened. > > The only troubling bit is the fb refcounti

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm: Move ->old_fb from crtc to plane

2014-07-29 Thread Matt Roper
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:19PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Atomic implemenations for legacy ioctls must be able to drop locks. > Which doesn't cause havoc since we only do that while constructing > the new state, so no driver or hardware state change has happened. > > The only troubling bit