Hi,
Now I'm getting this in my dmesg (1/5 and 2/5 still applied to -rc1):
ACPI: thermal control disabled
Non-volatile memory driver v1.3
Linux agpgart interface v0.103
agpgart-intel :00:00.0: Intel 965GME/GLE Chipset
agpgart-intel :00:00.0: detected
Hi,
Now I'm getting this in my dmesg (1/5 and 2/5 still applied to -rc1):
ACPI: thermal control disabled
Non-volatile memory driver v1.3
Linux agpgart interface v0.103
agpgart-intel :00:00.0: Intel 965GME/GLE Chipset
agpgart-intel :00:00.0: detected
Well, that's odd. I'll look into it this week.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Well, that's odd. I'll look into it this week.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:36:54 +0100 Sedat Dilek googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> ( Original posting from [1] )
>>
>> I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
>> maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
>
( Original posting from [1] )
I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
Also the last series from 14-Jan-2011 (see 1-5 patch from [2] and the
following ones at dri-devel ML).
If you couldn't find the updated v2 ra
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:03:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I updated the new drivers/video/backlight/adp5520_bl.c, but there's a
> decent chance that unconverted drivers will sneak in. I trust they
> will still work OK?
They should fire a warning on registration but otherwise work. I'll sen
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:36:54 +0100 Sedat Dilek
> wrote:
>
>> ( Original posting from [1] )
>>
>> I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
>> maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
>> Also the la
Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> I tried to apply this patch but I get:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> 'intel_panel_setup_backlight':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct
> backlight_properties' has no member named 'type'
> drivers/gpu/drm/i
Hi,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Not all systems expose a firmware or platform mechanism for changing the
> backlight intensity on i915, so add native driver support.
After switching to 2.6.38-rc1 from 2.6.37
/sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
disappeared and I cannot control the
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
> Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
>
> > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> > > 'intel_panel_setup_backli
Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> I tried to apply this patch but I get:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> 'intel_panel_setup_backlight':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct
> backlight_properties' has no member named 'type'
> drivers/gpu/drm/i
Hi,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Not all systems expose a firmware or platform mechanism for changing the
> backlight intensity on i915, so add native driver support.
After switching to 2.6.38-rc1 from 2.6.37
/sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
disappeared and I cannot control the
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:36:54 +0100 Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> ( Original posting from [1] )
>
> I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
> maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
> Also the last series from 14-Jan-2011 (see 1-5 patch from [2] and the
> fol
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:36:54 +0100 Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> ( Original posting from [1] )
>
> I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
> maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
> Also the last series from 14-Jan-2011 (see 1-5 patch from [2] and the
> fol
( Original posting from [1] )
I have the backlight-type patchset for months in my patch-series (and
maintained them if necessary against daily linux-next).
Also the last series from 14-Jan-2011 (see 1-5 patch from [2] and the
following ones at dri-devel ML).
If you couldn't find the updated v2 ra
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:03:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I updated the new drivers/video/backlight/adp5520_bl.c, but there's a
> decent chance that unconverted drivers will sneak in. I trust they
> will still work OK?
They should fire a warning on registration but otherwise work. I'll sen
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:59 +
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
> > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> >
> > > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > > > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:59 +
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
> > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> >
> > > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > > > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
> Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
>
> > Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> > > 'intel_panel_setup_backli
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> > 'intel_panel_setup_backlight':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct
> > bac
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:43:46 +0330
Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> > I tried to apply this patch but I get:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c: In function
> > 'intel_panel_setup_backlight':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:319: error: 'struct
> > bac
22 matches
Mail list logo
