On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:42:35AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 4 Dec 2014 21:03:25 +,
> Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > The current implementation of drm_read() faces a number of issues:
> >
> > 1. Upon an error, it consumes the event which may lead to the client
> > blocking.
> > 2. Up
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:03:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current implementation of drm_read() faces a number of issues:
>
> 1. Upon an error, it consumes the event which may lead to the client
> blocking.
> 2. Upon an error, it forgets about events already copied
> 3. If it fails to cop
