On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:21:44AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I am not convinced this is the correct solution. At least the way we
> > used this interface, it isn't meant to ever fail. I also didn't look
> > into exactly why we de
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:21:44AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I am not convinced this is the correct solution. At least the way we
> used this interface, it isn't meant to ever fail. I also didn't look
> into exactly why we depend an ENOSPC return. That sounds fragile to me,
> especially for a p
