Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fence: Do not use TIMER_IRQSAFE

2019-03-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2019-02-26 16:00:38) > > On 2019-02-12 17:28:57 [+0100], To linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org wrote: > > > The timer is initialized with TIMER_IRQSAFE flag. It does look like the > > > timer callback requires this flag at all

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fence: Do not use TIMER_IRQSAFE

2019-03-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-02-28 10:09:26) > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > It may not be the best of api, but it's the only one available for the > > > driver to use... > > > > The comment in the header files says clearly: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fence: Do not use TIMER_IRQSAFE

2019-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-02-28 10:09:26) > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Quoting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2019-02-26 16:00:38) > > > On 2019-02-12 17:28:57 [+0100], To linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org wrote: > > > > The timer is initialized with TIMER_IRQSAFE flag. It does look

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fence: Do not use TIMER_IRQSAFE

2019-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2019-02-26 16:00:38) > On 2019-02-12 17:28:57 [+0100], To linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org wrote: > > The timer is initialized with TIMER_IRQSAFE flag. It does look like the > > timer callback requires this flag at all. Its sole purpose is to ensure > > synchronisatio