[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-12-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 Ernst Sjöstrand changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-25 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #15 from Alex Deucher --- Created attachment 127542 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127542&action=edit possible fix Does this patch fix the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee fo

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-16 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #14 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Ernst Sjöstrand from comment #12) > Couldn't get anything after modprobe, the computer really dies. > However updating the firmware fixed it. > > Should there be some kind of check or do you co

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #13 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- I was running the Ubuntu firmware from Xenial, the firmware bundled in Wily fixed it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #12 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- Couldn't get anything after modprobe, the computer really dies. However updating the firmware fixed it. Should there be some kind of check or do you consider this fixed? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher --- Odd. We haven't seen any failures internally with Fiji and 3 VCE rings enabled. Can you provide a log of the failure? Try manually loading amdgpu after boot. E.g., append modprobe.blacklist=amdgpu to the

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #10 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- Created attachment 127299 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127299&action=edit Patch that fixes the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #9 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- I know what may have been fooling me. I run sudo make install on Ubuntu. It adds a .old entry in grub. However that .old entry doesn't have a .old initrd, where the amdgpu kernel module lives, it shares in

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-10 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #8 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- I have never been able to reproduce the problem with self-compiled 4.8-rc8 from that workspace so I think my local builds are working at least. drm/amd/amdgpu: enable clockgating only after late init sound

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #7 from Andy Furniss --- (In reply to Ernst Sjöstrand from comment #6) > Do you think I can get both false positives and false negatives? > Have tested a bit more but still behaving in a silly way... I guess your issue not as clear

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #6 from Ernst Sjöstrand --- Do you think I can get both false positives and false negatives? Have tested a bit more but still behaving in a silly way... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-04 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #5 from Andy Furniss --- Also the way 4.9-wip changes and things get merged may not make bisecting a long way back that easy compared to something like mesa. I notice it's changed again 17 hours ago - it may even work now without you

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-04 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #4 from Andy Furniss --- (In reply to Ernst Sjöstrand from comment #3) > This seems to be very hard to reproduce. Perhaps it's related to the kernel > I'm rebooting from or some complex combination. > Pretty hard to debug when the co

[Bug 98016] [bisected] Fury fails to boot on drm-next-4.9

2016-10-03 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 Ernst Sjöstrand changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[bisected] Fury fails to|[bisected] Fury fails to