[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Kai from comment #10) > > Do you still need the bisect? That would be great. As I mentioned before, there weren't really any dpm related changes for these parts in 4.7 (there weren't many chan

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #10 from Kai --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #9) > (In reply to Kai from comment #8) > > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #6) > > > Does reverting 5e031d9fe8b0741f11d49667dfc3ebf5454121fd (drm/radeon/pm: > > > update

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Kai from comment #8) > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #6) > > Does reverting 5e031d9fe8b0741f11d49667dfc3ebf5454121fd (drm/radeon/pm: > > update current crtc info after setting the powerst

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #8 from Kai --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #6) > Does reverting 5e031d9fe8b0741f11d49667dfc3ebf5454121fd (drm/radeon/pm: > update current crtc info after setting the powerstate) help? No, it does not for me (I fetched the

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 Kai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kai at dev.carbon-project.org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher --- Does reverting 5e031d9fe8b0741f11d49667dfc3ebf5454121fd (drm/radeon/pm: update current crtc info after setting the powerstate) help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher --- Can you verify that 4.6 works properly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher --- Unfortunately, none of the power management code for these asics changed during that time period, so nothing jumps out as a likely culprit. Did you also change your mesa stack or firmware in that time period?

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #3 from Clésio Luiz --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #1) > Can you bisect? Unfortunately, no. But the best I can say is that it started very early in kernel 4.7 schedule, since the Phoronix benchmark on the first link was

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #2 from Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail.com> --- Just a note: I am not experiencing such a performance regression on R9 390 with kernel 4.7.0 - 4.8.0-rc1, amdgpu.ko kernel module, Gentoo Linux. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 --- Comment #1 from Alex Deucher --- Can you bisect? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Bug 97260] R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 Bug ID: 97260 Summary: R9 290 low performance in Linux 4.7 Product: DRI Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Keywords