https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
nixscrip...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #10 from Jan Vesely ---
(In reply to nixscripter from comment #9)
> I have downloaded LLVM r290690 which contains your first diff, manually
> applied your 2nd diff, and compiled it. The resulting library seems to
> resolve the issue.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #9 from nixscripter at gmail.com ---
I have downloaded LLVM r290690 which contains your first diff, manually applied
your 2nd diff, and compiled it. The resulting library seems to resolve the
issue.
Once that patch is reviewed and app
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #8 from Jan Vesely ---
(In reply to nixscripter from comment #7)
> Normally, I would be asking in this comment if there is any progress on
> this, but I can tell there has been... change, at least.
>
> Now instead of crashing, it dea
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #7 from nixscripter at gmail.com ---
Normally, I would be asking in this comment if there is any progress on this,
but I can tell there has been... change, at least.
Now instead of crashing, it deadlocks the calling process waiting on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #6 from Jan Vesely ---
(In reply to Vedran MiletiÄ from comment #5)
> Can you dig the patch somewhere? I have a Caicos at hand and I would really
> like to test atomic compare-and-swap.
you can try my github branch [0], you'll need
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #5 from Vedran MiletiÄ ---
Can you dig the patch somewhere? I have a Caicos at hand and I would really
like to test atomic compare-and-swap.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- n
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #4 from jano.vesely at gmail.com ---
The instructions are there for EG+. They're tricky to implement because of the
register requirements. However, there might be some weird interaction when
using CB with the current stores, and loads
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #3 from nixscripter at gmail.com ---
I suspected it was that, based on the word "Atomic" being at fault.
Unfortunately, I cannot assist, as I'm not an expert on parallel architecture
and spending the last half hour reading AMD's docum
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #2 from Vedran MiletiÄ ---
(In reply to jano.vesely from comment #1)
> That's because global atomics are not implemented in LLVM backend (despite
> driver advertising the extensions).
> Shouldn't be too hard to them.
Are you sure th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #1 from jano.vesely at gmail.com ---
That's because global atomics are not implemented in LLVM backend (despite
driver advertising the extensions).
Shouldn't be too hard to them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
nixscripter at gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Linux (All)
Hardware
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
Bug ID: 96488
Summary: [r600g]OpenCL driver causes segfault in ImageMagick's
Histogram kernel
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
13 matches
Mail list logo
