[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-21 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 Vladimir Ysikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-10 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #25 from Michel Dänzer --- (In reply to Vladimir Ysikov from comment #24) > And little bonus, Xorg crash after star t firefox. See bug 89034. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-10 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #24 from Vladimir Ysikov --- Created attachment 113293 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=113293&action=edit Xorg.0.log I forgot about lib32-llvm. llvm-svn > lib32-llvm-svn > mesa. drm-next, llvm-svn, mesa-git #0

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-09 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #23 from Michel Dänzer --- > (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/swrast_dri.so failed > (libLLVM-3.5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) Looks like the dynamic linker can't find libLLVM-

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-09 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #22 from Vladimir Ysikov --- Created attachment 113266 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=113266&action=edit Xorg.0.log It happen after update llvm, not mesa. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-09 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #21 from Michel Dänzer --- (In reply to Vladimir Ysikov from comment #20) > I rebuild llvm-svn, mesa-git with debug symbols and get this: > > behem0th at ArchLinux ~ $ glxinfo > name of display: :0 > Error: couldn't find RGB GLX v

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #20 from Vladimir Ysikov --- >Is the crash the same? Can you get a backtrace? I rebuild llvm-svn, mesa-git with debug symbols and get this: behem0th at ArchLinux ~ $ glxinfo name of display: :0 Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #19 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Vladimir Ysikov from comment #18) > I try latest llvm-svn+mesa-git+drm-next and luxmark still crash. Is the crash the same? Can you get a backtrace? -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #18 from Vladimir Ysikov --- I try latest llvm-svn+mesa-git+drm-next and luxmark still crash. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was s

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-02-01 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #17 from Arek Ruśniak --- On CapeVerde 10.4.3 + llvm 3.5.1 gives somethings like this: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x7f73c55484d0: i64 = and 0x7f73c55487e8, 0x7f73c55406d8 [ORD=148] [ID=247] 0x7f73c55487e8: i64 = any_extend 0x7f73c

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-01-31 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #16 from Vladimir Ysikov --- mesa 10.5-git, llvm 3.5.1, linux drm-next behem0th at ArchLinux ~/AUR/KDE $ luxmark LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x7f45c9c4a518: i64 = and 0x7f45c9c4c290, 0x7f45c9c41ea8 [ORD=127] [ID=214] 0x7f45c9c4c290

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-01-24 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 Vladimir Ysikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2015-01-24 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 Laurent carlier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #13 from Aaron Watry --- Created attachment 102163 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=102163&action=edit Possible fix for luxmark segfault The luxrays kernels used an __attribute__(work_group_size_hint(64,1,1)) on s

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-27 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 Aaron Watry changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #101243|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #11 from joshua.r.marshall.1991 at gmail.com --- Exact same back trace with and without luxrays. This also working off of this morning's mesa-git build. sorry I can't be of more help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #10 from joshua.r.marshall.1991 at gmail.com --- this was obtained by "gdb luxmark" and then entering "run" at the prompt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part ---

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #9 from joshua.r.marshall.1991 at gmail.com --- Currently, I am using the luxmark packaged in arch linux's repo's. I'm not seeing exactly what you are, so I'll include a BT: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #8 from Aaron Watry --- Created attachment 101243 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=101243&action=edit Test Case for SLG InitFrameBuffer Kernel I've tracked down where slg4 is segfaulting on my machine currently. T

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #7 from Aaron Watry --- I've sent a whole bunch of patches to the libclc dev list implementing quite a few builtin CL functions that were missing. luxrays/slg4 is now able to compile the CL kernels, but it now gets an LLVM Error at a

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #6 from Aaron Watry --- If you're building from luxrays source, can you also try disabling image support and seeing if the error changes? For a source build, go to scenes/luxball/luxball.cfg, and add: accelerator.imagestorage.enable

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #5 from Aaron Watry --- Created attachment 100762 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=100762&action=edit slg4 log with CEDAR What command are you running this with? Is it just running bin/slg4 as built from the luxr

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-06-08 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #4 from joshua.r.marshall.1991 at gmail.com --- I have the exact same issue. Unfortunately, debug information is not easy to do, especially without risking my whole desktop environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-03-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Ysikov --- Created attachment 96222 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=96222&action=edit bt full -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-03-22 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Ysikov --- Created attachment 96194 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=96194&action=edit New trace I rebuild mesa, llvm, clang, libclc, luxmark with debug compilation flags. https://wiki.archlinux.

[Bug 76223] [radeonsi] luxmark segfault

2014-03-21 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76223 --- Comment #1 from Tom Stellard --- This back trace doesn't include any symbols from LLVM or Mesa. Were there any errors printed to the console? Are there debugging flags or environment variables you can enable to get more information? -- Yo