[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 Bruno Jim?nez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #9 from Emil Velikov --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hi, > > I'm afraid that that patch doesn't help. I have also tried the patch you > have sent to the Mailing List ( > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-February/054

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #8 from Bruno Jim?nez --- Hi, I'm afraid that that patch doesn't help. I have also tried the patch you have sent to the Mailing List ( http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-February/054780.html ) but also nothing. If t

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Jim?nez --- Hi Francisco, The segfaults were caused because 'clGetPlatformIDs' returned an strange error (-1001), and when passed to 'clUtilErrorString' (from 'cl_util.c') it meant an unhandled error case. So it returne

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #6 from Emil Velikov --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Most likely you're getting that segfault somewhere in the ICD loader because > it's unable to load Mesa's ICD library. I guess that this hunk: > > +if NEED_WINSYS_XLIB > +AM_CPP

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #5 from Francisco Jerez --- (In reply to comment #4) > I am also very surpised of what commit seems to start this. I have done the > bisect making Arch packages, installing and then testing them. So, unless I > have missed something,

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Jim?nez --- I am also very surpised of what commit seems to start this. I have done the bisect making Arch packages, installing and then testing them. So, unless I have missed something, which is also possible, that's it

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #3 from Emil Velikov --- Strange I do not see how the commit will cause other than compilation issues. FWIW might be worth double-checking that the bisect went fine and attaching a back trace of the segfault. -- You are receiving th

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Jim?nez --- Hi Emil, No, it's not a compilation error, nor for mesa nor for opencl code. It's just that OpenCL programs crash with segfaults. Every test from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tstellar/opencl-example/ fails

[Bug 75400] regression in OpenCL since commit cc3aeac

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75400 --- Comment #1 from Emil Velikov --- Hi Bruno What you mean with "broken" here ? If you're talking about a compilation problem take a look at bug 75356, which has a patch to resolve it. If you are having different a problem let us know what it