[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #6 from Ch?-Thanh Christopher Nguy?n --- Ah sorry, I missed that somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #5 from Kris --- Cleaner patch already in mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-August/043882.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #4 from Ch?-Thanh Christopher Nguy?n --- Patch sent: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-August/043891.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Miller --- The proposed patch worked for me (Gentoo Linux, mesa-9.2.0_rc2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrub

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #6 from Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn --- Ah sorry, I missed that somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lis

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #5 from Kris --- Cleaner patch already in mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-August/043882.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. __

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #4 from Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn --- Patch sent: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-August/043891.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. __

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Miller --- The proposed patch worked for me (Gentoo Linux, mesa-9.2.0_rc2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing li

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #2 from Emil Velikov --- Seems like test always priorities the _and_ over _or_ :) Kris' patch does the right thing, although it can be simplified to either: test "x$HAVE_GALLIUM_I915" = xyes -o "x$HAVE_GALLIUM_SOFTPIPE" = xyes && te

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #1 from Kris --- Created attachment 84625 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=84625&action=edit Fix order of "and"/"or" for AM_CONDITIONAL Seems to be problem within configure.ac, occuring since: http://cgit.freedes

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #2 from Emil Velikov --- Seems like test always priorities the _and_ over _or_ :) Kris' patch does the right thing, although it can be simplified to either: test "x$HAVE_GALLIUM_I915" = xyes -o "x$HAVE_GALLIUM_SOFTPIPE" = xyes && te

[Bug 68544] cannot build mesa 9.2 without llvm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 --- Comment #1 from Kris --- Created attachment 84625 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=84625&action=edit Fix order of "and"/"or" for AM_CONDITIONAL Seems to be problem within configure.ac, occuring since: http://cgit.freedes