https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
Andreas Boll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
Andreas Boll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #7 from Marc Dietrich ---
arr, yes, master is right (I had an unclean tree), and also yes, r600 llvm in
mesa is marked experimental and needs to be enabled explicitly, so all is fine
- sorry.
Patch looks also fine (tested).
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
Andreas Boll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #82362|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Boll ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> You should also remove "or newer".
Yes, will do.
> Also "master" isn't the right branch
> (which one is the right?).
master is the right branch. See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #7 from Marc Dietrich ---
arr, yes, master is right (I had an unclean tree), and also yes, r600 llvm in
mesa is marked experimental and needs to be enabled explicitly, so all is fine
- sorry.
Patch looks also fine (tested).
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #4 from Marc Dietrich ---
You should also remove "or newer". Also "master" isn't the right branch (which
one is the right?). While you are at it, checking for r600 target isn't enough,
because it also needs "host".
I have the feeling
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Boll ---
Created attachment 82362
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82362&action=edit
possible fix (untested)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #2 from Michel D?nzer ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So I think we should abort in configure if someone wants to build mesa 9.1
> with enabled llvm backend and llvm != 3.2.
Agreed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Boll ---
The llvm backends of r600g and the radeonsi on mesa 9.1 are only compatible
with tstellar's llvm-3.2 branch.
The llvm backends of r600g and the radeonsi on mesa 9.2 should be compatible
with the official llvm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
Andreas Boll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #82362|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Boll ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> You should also remove "or newer".
Yes, will do.
> Also "master" isn't the right branch
> (which one is the right?).
master is the right branch. See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #4 from Marc Dietrich ---
You should also remove "or newer". Also "master" isn't the right branch (which
one is the right?). While you are at it, checking for r600 target isn't enough,
because it also needs "host".
I have the feeling
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Boll ---
Created attachment 82362
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82362&action=edit
possible fix (untested)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #2 from Michel Dänzer ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So I think we should abort in configure if someone wants to build mesa 9.1
> with enabled llvm backend and llvm != 3.2.
Agreed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Boll ---
The llvm backends of r600g and the radeonsi on mesa 9.1 are only compatible
with tstellar's llvm-3.2 branch.
The llvm backends of r600g and the radeonsi on mesa 9.2 should be compatible
with the official llvm
16 matches
Mail list logo
