https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #16 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-28 04:38:04 PST ---
No change with the latest commits, but caps->hiz_ram = 0; makes the problem go
away.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #16 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-28 04:38:04 PST ---
No change with the latest commits, but caps->hiz_ram = 0; makes the problem go
away.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #15 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-28 03:08:44 PST ---
If the latest commits don't help, please add the following line at the end of
r300_chipset.c and test again:
caps->hiz_ram = 0;
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/use
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #15 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-28 03:08:44 PST
---
If the latest commits don't help, please add the following line at the end of
r300_chipset.c and test again:
caps->hiz_ram = 0;
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/us
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #14 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-27 16:10:23 PST ---
I have fixed the 8x8 compression mode in master. It should fix the bottom of
the screen being uninitialized. Please test.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #14 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-27 16:10:23 PST
---
I have fixed the 8x8 compression mode in master. It should fix the bottom of
the screen being uninitialized. Please test.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #13 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-26 07:59:30 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42527)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42527)
shadowtex screenshot
Okay, so if I have done this correctly, the small white area in the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #13 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-26 07:59:30 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42527)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42527)
shadowtex screenshot
Okay, so if I have done this correctly, the small white area in the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #12 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-25 16:38:57 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42497)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42497
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32945&attachment=42497
hyperz fix v3
Than
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #12 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-25 16:38:57 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=42497)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42497
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32945&attachment=42497
hyperz fix v3
Tha
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #11 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 15:37:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It doesn't add up. Changing numdw must make a visible difference, it
> determines
> how many pixels are cleared (multiplied by something).
>
> I don't t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #11 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 15:37:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It doesn't add up. Changing numdw must make a visible difference, it
> determines
> how many pixels are cleared (multiplied by something).
>
> I don't t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #10 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-25 14:55:02 PST ---
It doesn't add up. Changing numdw must make a visible difference, it determines
how many pixels are cleared (multiplied by something).
I don't think 0 is even allowed. Try 1 and see ho
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #10 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-25 14:55:02 PST
---
It doesn't add up. Changing numdw must make a visible difference, it determines
how many pixels are cleared (multiplied by something).
I don't think 0 is even allowed. Try 1 and see h
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #9 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 14:29:28 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42495)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42495)
dmesg output
(In reply to comment #8)
> It appears that one third of the zbuffer is not c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #9 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 14:29:28 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42495)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42495)
dmesg output
(In reply to comment #8)
> It appears that one third of the zbuffer is not c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #8 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-25 08:33:52 PST ---
It appears that one third of the zbuffer is not cleared on your machine. In
src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_emit.c, can you add this line:
numdw = ALIGN_DIVUP(numdw * 3, 2);
at line 1171
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #8 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-25 08:33:52 PST
---
It appears that one third of the zbuffer is not cleared on your machine. In
src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_emit.c, can you add this line:
numdw = ALIGN_DIVUP(numdw * 3, 2);
at line 117
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42459|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42459|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #6 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-25 07:54:26 PST ---
I've made a new patch. Could you give it a try?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42464
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #6 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-25 07:54:26 PST
---
I've made a new patch. Could you give it a try?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42464
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 06:34:55 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42459)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42459)
screenshot from doom3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 06:34:55 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42459)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42459)
screenshot from doom3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #4 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 06:32:09 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42458)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42458)
glxgears screenshot with patch
The patch is a big improvment, but it doesn't completely s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #4 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-25 06:32:09 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42458)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42458)
glxgears screenshot with patch
The patch is a big improvment, but it doesn't completely s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #3 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-24 21:00:14 PST ---
Does this patch fix anything?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42432
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #3 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-24 21:00:14 PST
---
Does this patch fix anything?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42432
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #2 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-10 08:00:41 PST ---
Doh! Yeah, I suppose that's a lot more plausible.(In reply to comment #1)
> Doesn't the performance boost come from the fact that a large part of the
> screen is not rendered?
Doh! Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #2 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-01-10 08:00:41 PST ---
Doh! Yeah, I suppose that's a lot more plausible.(In reply to comment #1)
> Doesn't the performance boost come from the fact that a large part of the
> screen is not rendered?
Doh! Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-09 15:07:37 PST ---
Doesn't the performance boost come from the fact that a large part of the
screen is not rendered?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #1 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-09 15:07:37 PST
---
Doesn't the performance boost come from the fact that a large part of the
screen is not rendered?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Yo
32 matches
Mail list logo
