https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #19 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-28 10:56:20 PST ---
I think I know the reason why it's slow with the rename_regs pass.
The statistics of the most complex shader are:
FRAGMENT PROGRAM ~~~
~ 108 Instructions
~ 71 Vector Ins
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #19 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-28 10:56:20 PST
---
I think I know the reason why it's slow with the rename_regs pass.
The statistics of the most complex shader are:
FRAGMENT PROGRAM ~~~
~ 108 Instructions
~ 71 Vector In
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #18 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-28 03:42:50 PST
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> The right side of this screenshot that you posted:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516
> Looks a lot like what I see when I disable th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #18 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-28 03:42:50
PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> The right side of this screenshot that you posted:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516
> Looks a lot like what I see when I disable th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #17 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 01:36:08 PST
---
The right side of this screenshot that you posted:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516
Looks a lot like what I see when I disable the reg rename pass.
I've double ch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #17 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 01:36:08
PST ---
The right side of this screenshot that you posted:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516
Looks a lot like what I see when I disable the reg rename pass.
I've double ch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #16 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-28 00:53:06 PST
---
I'm puzzled, because here with mesa master + disable scheduler rewrite patch, I
get the wrong behavior (right part of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516 ). However
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #16 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-28 00:53:06
PST ---
I'm puzzled, because here with mesa master + disable scheduler rewrite patch, I
get the wrong behavior (right part of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516 ). However
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #15 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:22:12 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=42627)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42627)
Screenshot with scheduler patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #15 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:22:12
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42627)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42627)
Screenshot with scheduler patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #14 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:21:18 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=42626)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42626)
Screenshot with RADEON_DEBUG=noopt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/us
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #14 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:21:18
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42626)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42626)
Screenshot with RADEON_DEBUG=noopt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/us
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #13 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:20:29 PST
---
I'm pretty sure this is a bug in the scheduler. I'm attaching screenshots
comparing running with this patch:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42514 to running with
RADE
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #13 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-28 00:20:29
PST ---
I'm pretty sure this is a bug in the scheduler. I'm attaching screenshots
comparing running with this patch:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42514 to running with
RADE
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #12 from Marek Olšák 2011-01-27 02:20:19 PST ---
Well, if I disable the register rename pass, the Penumbra shadows are rendered
more or less correctly, so it must be a bug somewhere in the pair passes (or
maybe even rename_regs).
My
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #12 from Marek Ol??k 2011-01-27 02:20:19 PST
---
Well, if I disable the register rename pass, the Penumbra shadows are rendered
more or less correctly, so it must be a bug somewhere in the pair passes (or
maybe even rename_regs).
My
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-27 01:18:41 PST
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> > error messages like this:
> >
> > r300: ER
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-27 01:18:41
PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> > error messages like this:
> >
> > r300: ER
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #10 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-27 00:48:55 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> error messages like this:
>
> r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned, n
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #10 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-27 00:48:55
PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> error messages like this:
>
> r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned, n
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #9 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-26 09:05:17 PST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=42516)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516)
> screenshot of the problem
>
> Hi, this patch doesn't help nei
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #9 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-26 09:05:17
PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=42516)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516)
> screenshot of the problem
>
> Hi, this patch doesn't help nei
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-26 02:17:15 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=42516)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516)
screenshot of the problem
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=42514)
V
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-26 02:17:15
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42516)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42516)
screenshot of the problem
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=42514)
V
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42355|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42355|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-25 05:24:00 PST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=42355)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42355
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31830&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-25 05:24:00
PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=42355)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42355
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31830&attachm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #5 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-24 01:13:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=42355)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42355
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31830&attachment=42355
Possible Fix
I th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #5 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-24 01:13:49
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42355)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42355
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31830&attachment=42355
Possible Fix
I th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Ondračka 2011-01-23 00:53:39 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> error messages like this:
>
> r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2011-01-23 00:53:39
PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
> error messages like this:
>
> r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-23 00:33:24 PST
---
What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
error messages like this:
r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned, not enough hardware slots.
r300: ER
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
--- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard 2011-01-23 00:33:24
PST ---
What penumbra quality number are you using in Lightsmark? Are you seeing any
error messages like this:
r300: ERROR: FS input generic 18 unassigned, not enough hardware slots.
r300: ER
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Pavel Ondračka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[bisected] Unigine |[bisected] broken shadows
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31830
Pavel Ondra?ka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[bisected] Unigine |[bisected] broken shadows
38 matches
Mail list logo