[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #6 from Ian Romanick 2010-08-07 16:20:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > We were thinking about failing to compile a GLSL shader, which, I guess, > should > be ok from the specification point of view, but I doubt any application

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #6 from Ian Romanick 2010-08-07 16:20:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > We were thinking about failing to compile a GLSL shader, which, I guess, > should > be ok from the specification point of view, but I doubt any application

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #5 from Marek Olšák 2010-08-07 13:54:47 PDT --- Well, applications of course check whether a shader has been compiled successfully, but I really doubt it has a replacement shader which is good enough so that it does not distract a use

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #5 from Marek Ol??k 2010-08-07 13:54:47 PDT --- Well, applications of course check whether a shader has been compiled successfully, but I really doubt it has a replacement shader which is good enough so that it does not distract a us

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #4 from Marek Olšák 2010-08-07 13:49:59 PDT --- We have a shader which outputs (0,0,0,1) when there is an unsupported instruction. I guess it won't make any difference if we fake the instruction like you said, compared to what we have

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #4 from Marek Ol??k 2010-08-07 13:49:59 PDT --- We have a shader which outputs (0,0,0,1) when there is an unsupported instruction. I guess it won't make any difference if we fake the instruction like you said, compared to what we hav

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #3 from Ian Romanick 2010-08-07 12:19:01 PDT --- i915 is going to have the same problem when we enable GLSL there. Our plan is to emit a warning in the shader log and have DDX and DDY always return 0. We've also discussed having a

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #3 from Ian Romanick 2010-08-07 12:19:01 PDT --- i915 is going to have the same problem when we enable GLSL there. Our plan is to emit a warning in the shader log and have DDX and DDY always return 0. We've also discussed having a

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #1 from Priit Laes (irc: plaes) 2010-08-07 09:40:58 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=37673) --> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37673) glxinfo.log OpenGL vendor string: X.Org R300 Project OpenGL renderer string: Ga

[Bug 29439] [r300g] shaders/glsl-const-builtin-derivatives unknown opcode DDX

2010-08-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29439 --- Comment #1 from Priit Laes (irc: plaes) 2010-08-07 09:40:58 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=37673) --> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37673) glxinfo.log OpenGL vendor string: X.Org R300 Project OpenGL renderer string: Ga