https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #16 from Yann 2010-08-13 14:21:38 PDT ---
Does it mean it will be solved in Ubuntu 10.10 ?
Or is there something Ubuntu developpers have to do ?
Do I need to add something in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602267 ?
--
Configure bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #16 from Yann 2010-08-13 14:21:38 PDT ---
Does it mean it will be solved in Ubuntu 10.10 ?
Or is there something Ubuntu developpers have to do ?
Do I need to add something in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602267 ?
--
Configure bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #14 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-27 05:18:52 PDT ---
If I understand this correctly, the gallium driver from the PPA prints "radeon:
The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.", but the driver from
git works like a charm. Is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #14 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-27 05:18:52 PDT
---
If I understand this correctly, the gallium driver from the PPA prints "radeon:
The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.", but the driver from
git works like a charm. Is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #13 from Yann 2010-07-27 05:05:44 PDT ---
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. glxinfo|grep renderer # it should say Gallium 0.4 on R*
it said "OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on RS482"
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. /usr/lib/xscreensaver/pipes
wor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #13 from Yann 2010-07-27 05:05:44 PDT ---
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. glxinfo|grep renderer # it should say Gallium 0.4 on R*
it said "OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on RS482"
> LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=. /usr/lib/xscreensaver/pipes
wor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #12 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-27 03:43:29 PDT ---
It doesn't install anything, so there is nothing to revert. Your system will be
untouched.
LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=some_path program
says that the 3D driver for the "program" is loaded fro
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #12 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-27 03:43:29 PDT
---
It doesn't install anything, so there is nothing to revert. Your system will be
untouched.
LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=some_path program
says that the 3D driver for the "program" is loaded fr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #11 from Yann 2010-07-27 03:22:31 PDT ---
Thank you. Please how can I revert those changes after I test ? (I save my
data, but this is my production PC so I would like to keep it as stable as
possible)
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #11 from Yann 2010-07-27 03:22:31 PDT ---
Thank you. Please how can I revert those changes after I test ? (I save my
data, but this is my production PC so I would like to keep it as stable as
possible)
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #10 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-27 03:06:40 PDT ---
git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa
cd mesa
./autogen.sh --with-dri-drivers= --with-state-trackers=dri --enable-debug
--enable-glx-tls --enable-gallium-radeon --disable-ga
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #10 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-27 03:06:40 PDT
---
git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa
cd mesa
./autogen.sh --with-dri-drivers= --with-state-trackers=dri --enable-debug
--enable-glx-tls --enable-gallium-radeon --disable-g
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #9 from Yann 2010-07-27 01:36:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Have you compiled mesa with --enable-debug? It might give you some nice
> assertion failures hopefully.
i am not fan of compilation, but i can try it if it is necess
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #9 from Yann 2010-07-27 01:36:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Have you compiled mesa with --enable-debug? It might give you some nice
> assertion failures hopefully.
i am not fan of compilation, but i can try it if it is necess
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #8 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-27 01:07:30 PDT ---
Have you compiled mesa with --enable-debug? It might give you some nice
assertion failures hopefully.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #8 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-27 01:07:30 PDT
---
Have you compiled mesa with --enable-debug? It might give you some nice
assertion failures hopefully.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #7 from Yann 2010-07-27 00:01:16 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yann> Is the error in dmesg still the same, i.e. "Packet (351:3:16383) end
> after CS buffer"?
Yes, I tried again with rc6, and I get the following error :
[ 288.5
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #7 from Yann 2010-07-27 00:01:16 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yann> Is the error in dmesg still the same, i.e. "Packet (351:3:16383) end
> after CS buffer"?
Yes, I tried again with rc6, and I get the following error :
[ 288.5
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #6 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-26 06:11:41 PDT ---
Yann> Is the error in dmesg still the same, i.e. "Packet (351:3:16383) end
after CS buffer"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #6 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-26 06:11:41 PDT
---
Yann> Is the error in dmesg still the same, i.e. "Packet (351:3:16383) end
after CS buffer"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #5 from Yann 2010-07-16 06:57:20 PDT ---
Dear all,
I am the Launchpad bug reporter.
I tried kernel 2.6.35-020635rc5-generic , and I see no change when running
/usr/lib/xscreensaver/pipes :
I get the same error message ("radeon: The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #5 from Yann 2010-07-16 06:57:20 PDT ---
Dear all,
I am the Launchpad bug reporter.
I tried kernel 2.6.35-020635rc5-generic , and I see no change when running
/usr/lib/xscreensaver/pipes :
I get the same error message ("radeon: The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #4 from Marek Olšák 2010-07-15 19:04:32 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, I don't know if they are closer to RV350 or to RV370. One difference from
> those is that RS4xx have only two render output units, but that's irrelevant
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
--- Comment #4 from Marek Ol??k 2010-07-15 19:04:32 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, I don't know if they are closer to RV350 or to RV370. One difference from
> those is that RS4xx have only two render output units, but that's irrelevant
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Tormod Volden changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugs.launchpad.net/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Tormod Volden changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugs.launchpad.net/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|pipes triggers Assertion|[r300c, r300g] pipes
|`b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29066
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|pipes triggers Assertion|[r300c, r300g] pipes
|`b
30 matches
Mail list logo
