[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #11 from Julien Cristau 2011-03-07 10:30:26 PST --- > --- Comment #10 from Christopher James Halse Rogers > 2011-03-06 20:57:41 PST --- > This was fixed in ae57dcf6 anyway :) > only partly, see comment#4. -- Configure bugmail: h

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-07 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #11 from Julien Cristau 2011-03-07 10:30:26 PST --- > --- Comment #10 from Christopher James Halse Rogers gmail.com> 2011-03-06 20:57:41 PST --- > This was fixed in ae57dcf6 anyway :) > only partly, see comment#4. -- Configure bu

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Christopher James Halse Rogers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Christopher James Halse Rogers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matts...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Mat

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattst88 at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #8 from Sérgio M. B. 2011-03-05 17:28:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ping? As described in the initial report, there's no reason to prefer system > headers over those in the same source… I don't understand Sérgio's objection

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #8 from S?rgio M. B. 2011-03-05 17:28:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ping? As described in the initial report, there's no reason to prefer system > headers over those in the same source? I don't understand S?rgio's objection

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Cyril Brulebois changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@debian.org --- Comment #7 from Cy

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2011-03-05 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Cyril Brulebois changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kibi at debian.org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Julien Cristau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fre...@gmx.net --- Comment #6 from Juli

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 Julien Cristau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freetz at gmx.net --- Comment #6 from J

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-06-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #5 from Sérgio M. B. 2010-06-15 21:12:52 PDT --- What I'm try to say is, I think the ./configure of libdrm, should check what kernel version we have on system and require a version of kernel bigger than a number which libdrm, we are

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-06-15 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #5 from S?rgio M. B. 2010-06-15 21:12:52 PDT --- What I'm try to say is, I think the ./configure of libdrm, should check what kernel version we have on system and require a version of kernel bigger than a number which libdrm, we are

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #4 from Julien Cristau 2010-06-10 14:09:20 PDT --- the headers part was fixed in ae57dcf6e063860200b7949d5e2365e80ac4aea7, but libdrm is still missing from libkms_la_LIBADD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #4 from Julien Cristau 2010-06-10 14:09:20 PDT --- the headers part was fixed in ae57dcf6e063860200b7949d5e2365e80ac4aea7, but libdrm is still missing from libkms_la_LIBADD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-05-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #3 from Christopher James Halse Rogers 2010-05-25 23:35:04 PDT --- So, until there's an actual kernel incompatibility introduced for which runtime detection in libkms is necessary, is there any reason not to apply this patch? Buil

[Bug 26852] Build libkms against in-tree xf86drm.h

2010-05-25 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26852 --- Comment #3 from Christopher James Halse Rogers 2010-05-25 23:35:04 PDT --- So, until there's an actual kernel incompatibility introduced for which runtime detection in libkms is necessary, is there any reason not to apply this patch? Buil