https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #90 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
yousifjkadom, your problem has nothing to do with this bug, please create a new
bug for it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #89 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
@Michel Dänzer
Many thanks for your kind & rapid reply !
No ! No ! Since I was on Fedora 24 that I used for 11 months & then I upgraded
from Fedora 24 to Fedora 26, till now my Radeon VGA do not wo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #88 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
(In reply to yousifjkadom from comment #87)
Everything you say applies to the amdgpu kernel driver, but in the meantime,
your card should work with the radeon kernel driver. Doesn't it?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
yousifjka...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yousifjka...@yahoo.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #85 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Created attachment 258301
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=258301&action=edit
[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: revert tile table update for oland (for kernels v4.13 and
up)
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #84 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Created attachment 258183
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=258183&action=edit
[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: revert tile table update for oland (for kernels v4.10 to
v4.12)
--
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #83 from Rich (f...@bitservices.org.uk) ---
For anyone reading this, this is still broken in Kernel 4.12.8 (currently
latest).
Really concerned that this bug doesn't get fixed before 4.9 is no longer the
latest LONGTERM. Still wonderi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #82 from Zoltan Boszormenyi (zbos...@pr.hu) ---
This might be a related fix from Jean Delvare:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-July/148751.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assign
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #81 from Alexander Tsoy (alexan...@tsoy.me) ---
(In reply to Jean Delvare from comment #80)
> I tested the patch from comment #78 and unfortunately I have to report that
> it doesn't fix the problem for me, checkerboard effect is still
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #80 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
I tested the patch from comment #78 and unfortunately I have to report that it
doesn't fix the problem for me, checkerboard effect is still present.
Nevertheless these cleanups look good so
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #79 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Will test it when i get my hands on 4.12.4 kernel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #257745|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #78 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 257747
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=257747&action=edit
possible final fix?
Please try this patch instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #77 from Alexander Tsoy (alexan...@tsoy.me) ---
Can't test right now. BTW, why HAINAN_GB_ADDR_CONFIG_GOLDEN value is different
in different headers?
./amdgpu/sid.h:#define HAINAN_GB_ADDR_CONFIG_GOLDEN0x02010001
./amdgpu/si_enu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #76 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 257745
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=257745&action=edit
possible final fix?
Can you please test this patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Zoltan Boszormenyi (zbos...@pr.hu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbos...@pr.hu
--- Co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Rich (f...@bitservices.org.uk) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f...@bitservices.org.uk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #73 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Any further news about this issue?Why dont you just use the p4 config for the
afflicted cards as a fix?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #72 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Additional piece of the puzzle to the Oland mystery:
1) Oland uses Verde's GB_ADDR_CONFIG in one place:
case CHIP_OLAND:
...
gb_addr_config = VERDE_GB
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #71 from Alexander Tsoy (alexan...@tsoy.me) ---
(In reply to Alexander Tsoy from comment #70)
> For me P4_8x16 config fixed this issue.
>
> $ sudo dmesg | egrep 'RAM width|OLAND'
> [1.670667] [drm] initializing kernel modesetting
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Alexander Tsoy (alexan...@tsoy.me) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexan...@tsoy.me
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #257315|Bumped number Patch for |Bumped Patch version numbe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #257315|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #69 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 257315
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=257315&action=edit
Bumped number Patch for linux 4.12
Patch still works for linux 4.12.0
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #68 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Probably some mistake in the documentation, otherwise i doesnt make sense,
unless the use some magic lol, by the way with kernel 4.11.6 the problem got
worse, now also the desktop enviroment i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #66 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Regression persists with kernel 4.11.5, but
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256949 thankfully works and fixes
the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #65 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256949 works as it should with
kernel 4.11.4,tested both opengl and vulkan 3d apps and didnt notice any
regressions.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #64 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Latest patch fixed it for me with kernel 4.11.4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel m
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #63 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Cant you contact amd about what Oland64 and Oland128 mean?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
d
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #256949|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #62 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Created attachment 256949
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256949&action=edit
drm/amdgpu/gfx6: [TEST] fix tiling setup for oland (for v4.11)
Siyia, this is a test patch f
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #60 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Marek Olšák from comment #59)
> So it looks like 64-bit Oland needs the P4 config and 128-bit Oland needs
> the P2 config. Maybe the MC_ARB_RAMCFG patch will help with othe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #59 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
So it looks like 64-bit Oland needs the P4 config and 128-bit Oland needs the
P2 config. Maybe the MC_ARB_RAMCFG patch will help with other SI chips if it
doesn't help Oland.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #58 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
patching file drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 412.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 636.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c.rej
h
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #57 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256831&action=diff
is what fixes it for others, but I suspect
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256727&action=diff
is what will
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #56 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
i tried another possible fix from attachments
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #55 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
which one is suppossed to work on my card?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #54 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to siyia from comment #52)
> The first patch fails at compilation cannot use it.
[0.882491] [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR3
Yours is the 128bit version.
What patch did you
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #53 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
When i use the first patch i get:
patching file drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 412.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 636.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/g
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #52 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
The first patch fails at compilation cannot use it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-deve
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #51 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 256935
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256935&action=edit
dmesg output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #49 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to siyia from comment #48)
> Still happens with second patch only
Can you attach your demsg output?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #50 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
dmesg even.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.fr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #48 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Still happens with second patch only
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #47 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
This will take a while.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #46 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Ok i am compiling linux 4.11.4 with the second patch only, will post results
after installing it and booting it with amdgpu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assig
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #45 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
I ll see what i can do and will post back.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #44 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
I don't have Oland and I presume Alex doesn't have Oland either, so there is
nothing we can do. Whoever tests the patches will make the decision whether or
not they will be included in the ke
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #43 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Damn, i could a few weeks back with arch,but my current distro does not have an
easy way to compile from source and apply patches to kernels.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #42 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Yes, second == another.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@li
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #41 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
another possible fix patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #40 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to siyia from comment #39)
> After kernel 4.11.4 2d apps and videos work perfectly with amdgpu and r7
> 240,however any game either with opengl or vulkan,native or with wine gets
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eutychio...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #38 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
The second possible fix is a bug fix by itself (not just for this issue), seems
like an important fix affecting Mesa, and may change the outcome of the first
fix. (which we are still uncertai
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #37 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Alex, is the fix in comment #35 possibly related to this bug, or you just
happened to find it while reading the code?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #36 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
The patch in comment #33 is what I came up with (see comment #26) and it works
OK for me. Note that the second part of the patch isn't needed though, the
added condition will always be tree
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #35 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 256845
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256845&action=edit
another possible fix
This sets mc_arb_ramcfg properly for userspace.
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #34 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
BTW, adev->gfx.config.mc_arb_ramcfg is not set for SI. That might cause addrlib
to do something incorrect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #256727|0 |1
is obsole
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #32 from flora@amd.com ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #31)
> Flora, what is the bus width on your oland card?
128bits
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #31 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Flora, what is the bus width on your oland card?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #29 from Berg (b...@uralmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jean Delvare from comment #28)
> I don't know how reliable it is, but Wikipedia claims that the Radeon R5 240
> has a 128-bit bus to video RAM.
I confirm as the owner of the R7 240, -
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #28 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
I don't know how reliable it is, but Wikipedia claims that the Radeon R5 240
has a 128-bit bus to video RAM. Is it possible that the amdgpu driver is
getting it wrong?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #27 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Well then I wonder what the number in Oland128 means if it's not the bus width.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #24 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 256727
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=256727&action=edit
possible fix
Does this patch help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #23 from Marek Olšák (mar...@gmail.com) ---
Hi,
(BTW I'm from AMD)
First of all, if a kernel change breaks Mesa, the kernel change should be
reverted. Kernel changes should never ever break existing userspace. There are
released vers
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mic...@daenzer.net |
--- Comment #22 fro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #21 from flora@amd.com ---
Hi Michel,
This issue might has something with mesa. I add you to the cc list for you're
expert on open source umd.
It can be reproduced with oland + ubuntu + xinit + glxgears + mesa. reverting
(commit dr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #20 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
Flora, why did you add me to Cc? I get notifications via the dri-devel mailing
list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #19 from Berg (b...@uralmail.com) ---
I confirm:
Checkerboard effect when using amdgpu on Oland is back.
On amdgpu-pro the same effect has been for a long time (despite the fact that
my R7 240 is in the list of supported devices), but
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #18 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
I did not try the amdgpu-pro driver. My distribution (SUSE) doesn't appear to
be supported, and the download page doesn't list my hardware (Radeon R5 240) as
supported by this driver anyway.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #17 from flora@amd.com ---
I'll continue to check this issue. meanwhile you could revert the guilty commit
for quick fix. the tiling table is an optimization from hw team. btw, have u
try with amdgpu-pro driver? maybe that's the di
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #16 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
I tested Alex's branch amd-staging-4.11 as of yesterday (top commit
c285c73f2213) and it does NOT fix the bug.
Did it occur to you that there may be a simple bug in commit c7bc82efa60d
("dr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #15 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
And it's not just me, see:
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039806
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #14 from flora@amd.com ---
I don't know why it fails on your side, at least it works with my test PC.
anyway, you could revert it if this troubles you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #13 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Assuming you mean "in comment #1", well no, they do not work for me. Have you
tested? I naively trusted you, and as a result agreed not to get the
problematic commit reverted upstream, and n
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #12 from flora@amd.com ---
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=amd-staging-4.11
I didn't check the commits. The commits in #commit1 should work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #11 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Can you please point me to the exact tree and branch I am supposed to test?
Also, do you happen to know which commits in that branch are fixing the
problem?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #10 from flora@amd.com ---
glxgears works on oland with alex's 4.11 branch (HEAD: commit 3a7370c -
drm/amdgpu: correct emit frame size for vcn dec/enc ring).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee o
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #9 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Sorry there was a missing digit in the commit ID, I obviously meant
f8d9422ef80c ("drm/amdgpu: update tile table for oland/hainan".)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|No |Yes
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #6 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
OK, let's just revert then. I have just sent a revert patch to stable@.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
It's just an optimization.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #4 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
I know both are possible ;-) But I don't know what are the benefits of both
options. I'd go for just reverting one patch because it seems more simple, but
to be honest I have no idea what tha
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
--- Comment #2 from Jean Delvare (jdelv...@suse.de) ---
Thanks for the quick reply. I confirm that kernel v4.10.1 with commit
f8d9422ef80c ("drm/amdgpu: update tile table for oland/hainan") reverted works
again. Not sure why your commit ID is diff
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194761
flora@amd.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flora@amd.com
--- Comment #1 from
96 matches
Mail list logo
