[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: Support for LG lp120up1 panel with eDP input

2016-02-23 Thread sanjeev sharma
way to support multiple panel. http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts?h=imx_3.14.38_6qp_beta#n225 Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:42:54PM +0530, sanj

[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: Support for LG lp120up1 panel with eDP input

2016-02-22 Thread sanjeev sharma
Hello Jitao, Can't we add this panel information in device tree file instead inside the device driver ? Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jitao Shi wrote: > The LG lp120up1 TFT LCD panel with eDP interface is a 12.0" 1920x1280 > panel, which can be

[PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

2014-08-12 Thread sanjeev sharma
yes you are absolutely correct and the change I have done in other area i.e drivers/usb/storage/uas.c.In gpu drivers assert_spin_locked() make more sense. Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:38:50PM -0700, David Rient

[PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

2014-08-12 Thread sanjeev sharma
Thanks all and I replaced with lockdep_assert_held() which seems less overhead. Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:08 AM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Rob Clark wrote: > > > > I'm suggesting that if you don't want to incur the

[PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

2014-08-11 Thread sanjeev sharma
Hello David, Here is the old discussion carried out on this. http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/Is-spin-is-locked-safe-to-use-with-BUG-ON-WARN-ON-td654800.html#a921802 Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sanjeev sharma wrote: > Hello David, > > Do you see an

[PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

2014-08-11 Thread sanjeev sharma
Hello David, Do you see any problem in replacing with assert_spin_locked() and here is old discusion around the On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:15 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > spin_is_locked() always returns false in uniprocessor configurations > > an

[PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

2014-08-11 Thread sanjeev sharma
Hello Roeck, This should be replaced everywhere in driver.what do you say ? Regards Sanjeev Sharma On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > spin_is_locked() always returns false in uniprocessor configurations > and can therefore not be used with BUG_ON. Replace i