ers/scsi/hpsa.c | 10 +-
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c| 18
> --
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/hmm/hmm.c | 8
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
| 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c| 6 ++---
> drivers/platform/x86/compal-laptop.c | 18 +--
> drivers/s390/cio/device.c| 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c| 43
>
> drivers/thermal
On ?, 2012-09-27 at 00:11 -0600, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zhang, Rui
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:38 AM
> > To: Hugh Dickins
> > Cc: Sedat Dilek; Stephen Rothwell; Andrew Morton; Dan Car
Hi, hugh,
On ?, 2012-09-26 at 12:51 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 today's Linux-Next runs into the following
> > call-trace (machine freezes):
> >
> > Sep 26 19:22:58 fambox kernel: [ 11.124739] BUG: unable to handle
>
CC Durga.
On ?, 2012-09-26 at 19:42 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 201209025:
> >
> > The net-next tree lost a conflict but gained another against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The wireless-next tree gained a confli
On 四, 2012-09-27 at 00:11 -0600, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zhang, Rui
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:38 AM
> > To: Hugh Dickins
> > Cc: Sedat Dilek; Stephen Rothwell; Andrew Morton; D
Hi, hugh,
On 三, 2012-09-26 at 12:51 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 today's Linux-Next runs into the following
> > call-trace (machine freezes):
> >
> > Sep 26 19:22:58 fambox kernel: [ 11.124739] BUG: unable to handle
>
CC Durga.
On 三, 2012-09-26 at 19:42 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 201209025:
> >
> > The net-next tree lost a conflict but gained another against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The wireless-next tree gained a confli
On ?, 2012-08-02 at 21:45 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On ?, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >> > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:4
On ?, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
> > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0
On 四, 2012-08-02 at 21:45 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On 四, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >> > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:4
On 四, 2012-08-02 at 15:46 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > > AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
> > > ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0
On ?, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
> ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such
> cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the
> userspace because the user did not press the
On 三, 2012-08-01 at 15:49 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> AMD ACPI interface may overload the standard event
> ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE (0x81) to signal AMD-specific events. In such
> cases we don't want to send the keypress (KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE) to the
> userspace because the user did not press the
IMO, STUB_POULSBO should not select ACPI_VIDEO at all,
what do you think?
thanks,
rui
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:19 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Lee,
>
> Sorry I missed this thread.
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:51 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > Currently, there have no GMA500(P
IMO, STUB_POULSBO should not select ACPI_VIDEO at all,
what do you think?
thanks,
rui
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:19 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Lee,
>
> Sorry I missed this thread.
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:51 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > Currently, there have no GMA500(P
Hi, Lee,
Sorry I missed this thread.
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:51 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> Currently, there have no GMA500(Poulsbo) native video driver to support
> intel opregion. So, use this stub driver to enable the acpi backlight
> control sysfs entry files by requrest acpi_video_register
Hi, Lee,
Sorry I missed this thread.
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:51 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> Currently, there have no GMA500(Poulsbo) native video driver to support
> intel opregion. So, use this stub driver to enable the acpi backlight
> control sysfs entry files by requrest acpi_video_register
18 matches
Mail list logo
