Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 17:47 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer a écrit :
[snip]
> Did you mean the patch to tell dri to forget about bad checksums? If so, I
> already tried it and worked fine.
>
> If you are talking about something else, please give me some link :-)
I'm not talking a
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 16:51 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer a écrit :
> On Dom 01 May 2011 16:40:39 Thibaut Girka escribió:
> > [Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel]
> >
> > This whole bug really looks like #615598.
> > This migh
[Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel]
This whole bug really looks like #615598.
This might be a bug in nouveau or in the kernel.
Did the initial "breakage" of the screens occur with 2.6.38?
If so, you may want to try fixing your EDID info has explained in a
similar bug repo
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 ? 17:47 -0300, Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez
Meyer a ?crit :
[snip]
> Did you mean the patch to tell dri to forget about bad checksums? If so, I
> already tried it and worked fine.
>
> If you are talking about something else, please give me some link :-)
I'm not talking a
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 ? 16:51 -0300, Lisandro Dami?n Nicanor P?rez
Meyer a ?crit :
> On Dom 01 May 2011 16:40:39 Thibaut Girka escribi?:
> > [Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel]
> >
> > This whole bug really looks like #615598.
> > This migh
[Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel]
This whole bug really looks like #615598.
This might be a bug in nouveau or in the kernel.
Did the initial "breakage" of the screens occur with 2.6.38?
If so, you may want to try fixing your EDID info has explained in a
similar bug repo
