Re: Linux 6.3-rc3

2023-03-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:49 PM Kalle Valo wrote: > > Nathan Chancellor writes: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:26:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:05 AM Nathan Chancellor > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On the clang front, I am still seeing the following warning tur

[intel-gfx] How to determine supported HDMI versions of an Intel GPU

2021-12-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to any CCed mailing-lists ] Hi Daniel, I hope you are well. While searching for a new monitor I wanted to buy a miniHDMI->HDMI adapter or cable to connect it. My Samsung laptop has a Intel HD graphics 3000 GPU and a miniHDMI connector. Unfortunately, I have n

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm/swsmu: Avoid using structure_size uninitialized in smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics

2021-02-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
ot be known. > > Fixes: de4b7cd8cb87 ("drm/amd/pm/swsmu: unify the init soft gpu metrics > function") > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1304 > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor I fell over this today with Linux v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e. Tested-by: Sedat

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-08-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's > > > not picking up patches while on vacation. ;) > > > > I'm only half on vacation :) > > > > So I can pi

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] convert i915 to new mount API

2019-08-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
: do not leak module ref counter > Fee free to add: Reported-by: Sedat Dilek [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+icZUXh068m8UFeHDXCKDi0YfL2Z=woony7j7djlqat1cz...@mail.gmail.com/ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gemfs.c | 33 +++ > fs/filesystems.c

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-08-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32) > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the > > > > > user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page > > > > > f

linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

2016-07-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On 7/15/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:34:0: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c: In function > 'intel_opregion_get_panel_t

[PATCH] drm: vblank: Use POSIX date for DRM_INFO output

2015-12-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c index 607f493ae801..682cd4b3ba10 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c @@ -361,7

[regression] Re: [Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
sed@ - [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-fixes&id=721a09f7393de6c28a07516dccd654c6e995944a > -Daniel > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > On W

[Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ TO INTEL DRM DRIVERS maintainers ] >> >> Hi, >> >> out of curiosity and to play with the new bindeb-pkg make-target I >> built pre-v4.3-rc1 (git

[Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ TO INTEL DRM DRIVERS maintainers ] > > Hi, > > out of curiosity and to play with the new bindeb-pkg make-target I > built pre-v4.3-rc1 (git-describe says v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a) > Debian-kernel packages. > >

[Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ TO INTEL DRM DRIVERS maintainers ] Hi, out of curiosity and to play with the new bindeb-pkg make-target I built pre-v4.3-rc1 (git-describe says v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a) Debian-kernel packages. I see several bugs and call-traces. Two hit a warning in i915 (one snippet here, full dmesg-log and

Re: [PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
: Sedat Dilek --- include/drm/i915_drm.h | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h index aa983f3..61a8407 100644 --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ typedef

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
: Sedat Dilek --- include/drm/i915_drm.h | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h index aa983f3..61a8407 100644 --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ typedef

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Files att

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 13

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > I have bisected the iss

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11-rc5 + drm-intel-nightly: >> > >> > 5456fe3

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue,

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >&

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Files att

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Files attached. > > Can you also please attach a full dmesg so I can check for anything > unusual? > -2: BAD with your test-patch -3: GOOD wit

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > > chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: &g

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>> > I have b

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >>>

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue,

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >&

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Afte

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> After a logout from my "BROKEN" Unity-2D session - the login-screen >> for LightDM seems to be OK. >> Then entering my Unity-2D desktop is OK -

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with today's next-20130813 I cannot see 1/10 of my desktop-screen's >> top, it's simply black. >> I can estimate th

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130812: >>> >>> T

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130812: >> >> The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. >> >> The infiniband tr

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130812: > > The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The infiniband tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch and another so I used the version from next-20130812. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>> > On Tu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Afte

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> After a logout from my "BROKEN" Unity-2D session - the login-screen >> for LightDM seems to be OK. >> Then entering my Unity-2D desktop is OK -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with today's next-20130813 I cannot see 1/10 of my desktop-screen's >> top, it's simply black. >> I can estimate the UR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130812: >>> >>> The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130812: > > The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The infiniband tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch and another so I used the version from next-20130812. > >

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Fr

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:09:32PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>> The VMA manager is page-size based so drm_vma_node_size() returns the size >>> in pages

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
; PAGE_SHIFT so we no longer get EINVAL during mmaps due to too small >> buffers. >> >> This bug was introduced in commit: >> 0de23977cfeb5b357ec884ba15417ae118ff9e9b >> "drm/gem: convert to new unified vma manager" >> >> Fixes i915 gtt mmap

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:09:32PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>> The VMA manager is page-size based so drm_vma_node_size() returns the size >>> in pages

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
; PAGE_SHIFT so we no longer get EINVAL during mmaps due to too small >> buffers. >> >> This bug was introduced in commit: >> 0de23977cfeb5b357ec884ba15417ae118ff9e9b >> "drm/gem: convert to new unified vma manager" >> >> Fixes i915 gtt mmap

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula > wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>&g

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130724: >>> >>> Removed tree: >>&g

linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130724: > > Removed tree: > arm-dt (at maintainer's request) > > The wireless-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict > against Linus' tree. > > The tty tree lost its build failure. > > T

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: >>&

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130628: >>> >>> The regu

linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130628: > > The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20130628. > > The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree. > > The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130628: >>> >>> The regu

linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>>> >>>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>>> >>> >>&g

linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>> >> >> Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, >> waiting for danv

linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >> > > Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, > waiting for danvet to wake up and look, before I revert it later. > Thanks, I like fast responses. For followers... See "workqueue

linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130627: > > This tree produces the following warning when built for many (all?) > configs (it has been fixed in the drm tree): > > drivers/video/Kconfig:42:error: recursive dependency detected! > drivers/video/

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>>> >>>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>>> >>> >>> Already know

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>> >> >> Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, >> waiting for danv

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >> > > Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, > waiting for danvet to wake up and look, before I revert it later. > Thanks, I like fast responses. For followers... See "workqueue

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-n

linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-n

linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) >> failed like this: >> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_min_freq_set': >> i915_debugfs.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) >> failed like this: >> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_min_freq_set': >> i915_debugfs.

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, P

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> &g

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >>

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> 2013/

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >&g

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > &

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/

[git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 02/14/2013 01:10 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | >> xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). >> >> /* >>

gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). /* * Mesa 3-D graphics library * Version: 7.6 <--- ??? * * Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved. <--- ??? * Copyright (C) 2009 VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserve

Re: gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 02/14/2013 01:10 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | >> xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). >> >> /* >>

gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). /* * Mesa 3-D graphics library * Version: 7.6 <--- ??? * * Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved. <--- ??? * Copyright (C) 2009 VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserve

[PATCH drm-intel-nightly] drm/i915: Add a pipe A force quirk for Samsung NP530U3B-A01DE

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
top.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-January/024161.html [3] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=693101618a4beedf1b3d291860aee56c5fe44a1c Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: intel-gfx Cc: DRI Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_displa

BUG: circular locking dependency detected

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ CCing Linux-Next and MMOTM folks ] > > Original posting from Daniel see [0] > > [ QUOTE ] > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvald

BUG: circular locking dependency detected

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing Linux-Next and MMOTM folks ] Original posting from Daniel see [0] [ QUOTE ] On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King >> wrote: >> > >> > Which may or ma

[PATCH drm-intel-nightly] drm/i915: Add a pipe A force quirk for Samsung NP530U3B-A01DE

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
top.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-January/024161.html [3] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=693101618a4beedf1b3d291860aee56c5fe44a1c Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: intel-gfx Cc: DRI Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_displa

Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ CCing Linux-Next and MMOTM folks ] > > Original posting from Daniel see [0] > > [ QUOTE ] > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvald

  1   2   3   >