Hello,
Helge Deller, le ven. 15 mars 2024 10:35:40 +0100, a ecrit:
> You should have marked this patch with "v2"...
The actual changes were exactly the same.
> On 3/13/24 17:59, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This remains relatively simple by just enlarging integers.
>
By using bitmaps we actually support whatever size we would want, but the
console currently limits fonts to 64x128 (which gives 60x16 text on 4k
screens), so we don't need more for now, and we can easily increase later.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
Difference from v1:
- use a b
Luca Ceresoli, le mer. 13 mars 2024 17:45:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> This patch is clearly not formatted according to the standard format
> and it does not apply with 'git am'.
(Note: the failure of application was not related to the formatting at
all, but just a little fuzz for the static word in
stat
This remains relatively simple by just enlarging integers.
It wouldn't be that simple to get to the console's 64x128 maximum, as it would
require 128b integers.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c | 17 ++---
include/linux/fb.h
Luca Ceresoli, le mer. 13 mars 2024 17:45:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> Using 'git format-patch' and 'git send-email' is *very* recommended as
> it will take care of all the formatting for you.
It's quite a pitty that git cannot simply consume the output of diff.
Now I'll have to download 8GB of linux tre
This remains relatively simple by just enlarging integers.
It wouldn't be that simple to get to the console's 64x128 maximum, as it would
require 128b integers.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
Index: linux-6.4/drivers/video/fbdev/co
ch) call (since we already prevent loading a font larger than that),
and c = (font.width+7)/8 * vpitch * font.charcount will always remain
below max_font_size.
Fixes: 24d69384bcd3 ("VT: Add KD_FONT_OP_SET/GET_TALL operations")
Reported-by: syzbot+3af17071816b61e80...@syzkaller.appspotmai
eported-by: Sanan Hasanov
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
Fixes: 2d2699d98492 ("fbcon: font setting should check limitation of driver")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
v1 -> v2:
- Use BIT macro instead of fixing bit test by hand.
- Add Fixes and Cc: stable headers.
Index: linux-6.0/d
Jiri Slaby, le jeu. 26 janv. 2023 10:02:55 +0100, a ecrit:
> On 26. 01. 23, 1:49, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Index: linux-6.0/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c
> > ===
> > --- linux-6.0.orig/drivers/vid
Greg KH, le jeu. 26 janv. 2023 08:43:02 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:49:12AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > blit_x and blit_y are uint32_t, so fbcon currently cannot support fonts
> > larger than 32x32.
>
> "u32" you mean, right?
Right :)
Reported-by: Sanan Hasanov
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
Index: linux-6.0/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c
===
--- linux-6.0.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c
+++ linux-6.0/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c
@@ -2489,9 +2489,12
(FYI, the UB was already a problem before my big-font patch submission,
the checks I add here are already making sense in previous versions
anyway)
Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 26 janv. 2023 01:49:12 +0100, a ecrit:
> blit_x and blit_y are uint32_t, so fbcon currently cannot support fonts
>
I forgot to mention that this is linux 4.0.0
Samuel
Hello,
Yesterday, as usual I ran xlock before the night. In the morning, I
typed a key to wake it up, it didn't. I had to reboot. I could however
read in the logs:
Apr 14 05:00:13 type kernel: [33976.116204] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 63 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:69 assert_device_not_susp
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 10:53:01 +0100, a ?crit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 03:16:46 +0100, a ?crit :
> > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a ?crit :
> > > Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a ?crit :
> > &g
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 10:53:01 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 03:16:46 +0100, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a écrit :
> > &g
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 03:16:46 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a écrit :
> > Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault
> > > wrote:
>
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 Jan 2012 03:16:46 +0100, a ?crit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a ?crit :
> > Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a ?crit :
> > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault > > ens-lyon.org> wr
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a ?crit :
> Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a ?crit :
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault > ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> >
> > > At home only. At work, with a different VGA scree
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a écrit :
> Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a écrit :
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault
> > wrote:
> >
> > > At home only. At work, with a different VGA screen, I&#
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a écrit :
> Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a écrit :
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault
> > wrote:
> >
> > > At home only. At work, with a different VGA screen, I&#
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 16 Sep 2011 18:30:50 +0200, a ?crit :
> Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a ?crit :
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault > ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> >
> > > At home only. At work, with a different VGA scree
Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:22:48 -0500, a ?crit :
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
> > At home only. At work, with a different VGA screen, I'm still getting
> > the issue.
>
> You're still having a prob
Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 00:43:36 -0500, a écrit :
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:27:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1-rcsomething on a DELL latitude
> > E6420
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 09:41:06 +0200, a ?crit :
> Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 00:43:36 -0500, a ?crit :
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:27:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault > ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> > Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> > > I'm trying to upg
Keith Packard, le Thu 15 Sep 2011 00:43:36 -0500, a ?crit :
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:27:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1-rcsomething on a DELL latitude
> >
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1-rcsomething on a DELL latitude
E6420, but dual head is broken. Here is the scenario:
- Turn computer on with VGA1 connected. Both LVDS1 and VGA1 show the
text console fine.
- Start X. VGA1 shows X fine, but LVDS1 (1600x900 resolution) shows an
odd
27 matches
Mail list logo
