Sam
---
From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Tygier
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered
invalid. Instead just drop the in
Sam
---
From 33d4041a583c417c00f71a5453fed6cff5278de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Tygier
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DRM: ignore invalid EDID extensions
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be considered
invalid. Instead just drop the in
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Yeah, I hate to just drop extension blocks, but it's better than the
> alternative. They're optional for a reason I suppose.
>
For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extension block is
all zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VT
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
Yeah, I hate to just drop extension blocks, but it's better than the
alternative. They're optional for a reason I suppose.
For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extension block is
all zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VTs.
I suspe
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
>> On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
>>>> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
&g
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
considered invalid. Instead just drop the
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
>> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
>> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the
>> valid base block. The base block is
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the
valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have
extension block is all
zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VTs.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index f87bf10..5ade343 100644
extension block is all
zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VTs.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index f87bf10..5ade343 100644
With 2.6.25 and 2.6.26 kernels with KMS enabled i get completely blank screen
after booting, the monitor turns off because there is no signal, and i can
switch to a VT. i can however SSH in to the machine. also it boots fine with
radeon.modeset=0
with previous kernels the monitor works fine, co
With 2.6.25 and 2.6.26 kernels with KMS enabled i get completely blank screen
after booting, the monitor turns off because there is no signal, and i can
switch to a VT. i can however SSH in to the machine. also it boots fine with
radeon.modeset=0
with previous kernels the monitor works fine, c
12 matches
Mail list logo
