Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the feedback, do you mean the patch was applied to a wrong base?
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 1/7/21 6:45 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
AFAICT these are false positives. The instances have been fixed already.
Am 07.01.21 um 10:45 schrieb kernel test robot:
Hi Thomas,
I
Hi Alex,
We have ignored the amd-20.xx branches:
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/commit/acb8d1f213ec6841900e0d7e9737f8ea0960e4d3
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 12/15/20 10:24 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[AMD Public Use]
The test robot should probably not be testing the amd-20.xx branches
On 6/22/20 11:12 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 22.06.20 um 17:00 schrieb Rong Chen:
Hi Thomas,
I tested the patch based on commit 24b806b0a1dd3, the regression
Thanks!
of phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.1024x768.score still exists:
I expected that the test is related to drawing onto
Regards,
Rong Chen
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> We've had reports about performance regressions after switching
> mgag200 from VRAM helpers to SHMEM helpers. SHMEM pages use
> writecombine caching by default, but can also use the platform&#x
rm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:1: warning: 'ARM PrimeCell PL111 CLCD Driver'
not found
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On 6/17/20 8:29 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 17.06.20 um 11:22 schrieb Rong Chen:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:28:02AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Emil
Am 16.06.20 um 17:14 schrieb Emil Velikov:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 15:26, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The original
helper function
97 97
5cd8460e81e8f drm/mgag200: Clean up mga_crtc_do_set_base()
96
0671ca8c559ba drm/mgag200: Clean up mga_set_start_address()
e82c8969a2474 drm/mgag200: Remove HW cursor
96
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 16.06.20 um 05:10 schrieb Rong Chen:
On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot
wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due
Hi Emil,
Thanks for the guidance, we'll add these information in future reports.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Rong,
Thanks for the prompt reply and information. Can I suggest including
the suggested information in future reports.
I've included
On 6/16/20 11:10 AM, Rong Chen wrote:
On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot
wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
On one hand, I'm really happy t
%stddev change %stddev
\ |\
38550 38744
38549 38744 vm-scalability.median
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 1/6/20 9:19 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Feng,
do you still have the test setup that produced the perfo
221-083448
v3:
Douglas-Anderson/drm-bridge-ti-sn65dsi86-Improve-support-for-AUO-B116XAK01-other-DP/20191222-062646
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
-Doug
___
kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-...@lists.01
wn dma-buf implementation. Also, the patch set will start to compile
once linux-next is open for 5.6.
Cheers, Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for clarifying, we'll take a look at the wrong base.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/Retire-dma_buf_k-
%stddev change %stddev
\ | \ | \
42912 -15% 36517 44093
vm-scalability/performance-300s-8T-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb/lkp-knm01
42912 -15% 36517 44093 GEO-MEAN
vm-scalability.median
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
Hi,
On 8/7/19 6:42 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Rong
Am 06.08.19 um 14:59 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
Hi,
On 8/5/2019 6:25 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen:
Hi,
On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200
00s-8T-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb/lkp-knm01
43393 -20% 34575 GEO-MEAN
vm-scalability.median
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
While I have another finds, as I noticed your patch changed the bpp from
24 to 32, I had a patch to change it back to 24, and run the case in
the weekend, the
Hi,
On 8/1/19 7:58 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 13:25 schrieb Feng Tang:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 01.08.19 um 10:37 schrieb Feng Tang:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:19:53PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
commit
;s trying to measure.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with DRM, we enabled the console to output logs,
and attached please find the log file.
"Command line: ... console=tty0 earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200
console=ttyS0,115200 vga=normal rw"
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
kmsg.xz
Description: application/xz
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
#x27;s a lot of warnings here, and perhaps another fix is required to make
sure that the configs are set correctly? I can certainly take a look in
another patch but AFAICT this isn't an issue with my patch.
Please accept my apologies for taking your time, we will look into it.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
