"dirver"?
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
mentioned in their respective Kbuild
files?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http
Fix kernel-doc content to suppress warnings. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
someone is welcome to peruse this and tweak it further if they wish.
this gets rid of all of the DRM-related kerneldoc warnings.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm
as someone already working to clean that up?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
Fix kernel-doc content to suppress warnings. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
someone is welcome to peruse this and tweak it further if they wish.
this gets rid of all of the DRM-related kerneldoc warnings.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm
as someone already working to clean that up?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
: Robert P. J. Day
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
index 961ee08..34e6503 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
@@ -619,20 +619,11 @@ int drm_mmap_locked(struct file *filp, struct
vm_area_struct *vma)
offset
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > a pedantic observation, you can do with it what you wish (i'm not a
> > > li
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > a pedantic observation, you can do with it what you wish (i'm not a
> > list subscriber). in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c, we read (line 629):
&g
: Robert P. J. Day
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
index 961ee08..34e6503 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
@@ -619,20 +619,11 @@ int drm_mmap_locked(struct file *filp, struct
vm_area_struct *vma)
offset
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > a pedantic observation, you can do with it what you wish (i'm not a
> > > li
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > a pedantic observation, you can do with it what you wish (i'm not a
> > list subscriber). in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c, we read (line 629):
&g
ocessor test is for. admittedly, it
should work, it just seems unnecessary. and it makes the code more
confusing than it needs to be, but perhaps i've just misread
something.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Da
ocessor test is for. admittedly, it
should work, it just seems unnecessary. and it makes the code more
confusing than it needs to be, but perhaps i've just misread
something.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Da
if (!(bclp & ASLE_BCLP_VALID))
return ASLE_BACKLIGHT_FAILED;
and i once again got the black screen. is this still a known and
unresolved issue?
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day
if (!(bclp & ASLE_BCLP_VALID))
return ASLE_BACKLIGHT_FAILED;
and i once again got the black screen. is this still a known and
unresolved issue?
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day
.
rday
--
====
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin
.
rday
--
====
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:05:16 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > any new developments on this issue?
>
> Not really, the only thing left to confirm is whereabouts it goes wrong.
>
> A
o any more testing.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://tw
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:05:16 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> >
> > any new developments on this issue?
>
> Not really, the only thing left to confirm is whereabouts it goes wrong.
>
> A
o any more testing.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://tw
& MBOX_SWSCI) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("SWSCI supported\n");
opregion->swsci = base + OPREGION_SWSCI_OFFSET;
feel free to suggest more testing.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day
& MBOX_SWSCI) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("SWSCI supported\n");
opregion->swsci = base + OPREGION_SWSCI_OFFSET;
feel free to suggest more testing.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day
gave me a booting kernel, no black screen
issue. i will not pretend to understand why that fixes the problem
but it does.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2011, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:01 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" > > crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:23:08 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > all right. and since we're beyond git bisection, can you post a
> > list of say 2 or 3 tests you want me to try in order? as you
gave me a booting kernel, no black screen
issue. i will not pretend to understand why that fixes the problem
but it does.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2011, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:01 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:27:09 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > victory is mine! ok, that premature return seems to have solved it,
> > i'm up and running under this new kernel. are we gett
the
expert here, it would make more sense for you to try to optimize the
search pattern here.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:27:09 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > victory is mine! ok, that premature return seems to have solved it,
> > i'm up and running under this new kernel. are we gett
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:23:08 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > all right. and since we're beyond git bisection, can you post a
> > list of say 2 or 3 tests you want me to try in order? as you're t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:08:07 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > > That would be easy to test by returning early in intel_opregion_setup():
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i9
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:01 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > sadly, no change -- still black screen. again, rebooted
> > successfully under commit 8a327f23. just to be clear, here's &
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:32:04 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > > fix your boot issue or do we need to go back to using uncached:
> > >
> > > + return ioremap(phys, size);
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:59 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > so the culprit appears to be:
> >
> > b705120e4198315f4ae043de06c62f65e0851fd3 is the first bad commit
> > commit b705120e419
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:59 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > so the culprit appears to be:
> >
> > b705120e4198315f4ae043de06c62f65e0851fd3 is the first bad commit
> > commit b705120e419
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:24:17 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > Well, we have two endpoints, so let git attack:
> > >
&g
the
expert here, it would make more sense for you to try to optimize the
search pattern here.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:27:09 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > victory is mine! ok, that premature return seems to have solved it,
> > i'm up and running under this new kernel. are we getting close?
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:08:07 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > > That would be easy to test by returning early in intel_opregion_setup():
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opr
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:01 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > sadly, no change -- still black screen. again, rebooted
> > successfully under commit 8a327f23. just to be clear, here's "git
> >
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:32:04 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > > fix your boot issue or do we need to go back to using uncached:
> > >
> > > + return ioremap(phys, size);
> >
> >
e fact that the boot is obviously still progressing.
you can decide if that is at all helpful. back to bisecting.
should be getting close.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:59 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > so the culprit appears to be:
> >
> > b705120e4198315f4ae043de06c62f65e0851fd3 is the first bad commit
> > commit b705120e4198315f4ae0
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:59 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > so the culprit appears to be:
> >
> > b705120e4198315f4ae043de06c62f65e0851fd3 is the first bad commit
> > commit b705120e4198315f4ae0
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:24:17 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > Well, we have two endpoints, so let git attack:
> > >
&g
something *i've* done but, at this
point, it seems fairly reproducible.
are there any kernel command-line parms i might try that would be
informative? anything involving modesetting?
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day
e fact that the boot is obviously still progressing.
you can decide if that is at all helpful. back to bisecting.
should be getting close.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
something *i've* done but, at this
point, it seems fairly reproducible.
are there any kernel command-line parms i might try that would be
informative? anything involving modesetting?
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day
one more observation which should nail things down:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ok, i'm getting different results from this morning, not sure why,
> but i'm fairly confident i've isolated it to this extent. here's the
> salient part
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" >
one more observation which should nail things down:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ok, i'm getting different results from this morning, not sure why,
> but i'm fairly confident i've isolated it to this extent. here's the
> salient part
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> >
> > for me, this appears to be the offending commit:
> >
> > commit 5e82ea99827f6aa122fbb08f8659e76226ce107b (now testing)
> > Mer
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
> > >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:47:23 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > also, i just verified that i have a properly booting kernel based on
> > this commit:
> >
> > commit 58bbf018a70c562437eeae121a5d021ba7f
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:37:20 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> >
> > after suffering through the i915 "black screen" issue for a while,
> > it was a relief that it finally seemed to be resolved
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:37:20 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> >
> > after suffering through the i915 "black screen" issue for a while,
> > it was a relief that it finally seemed to be resolved
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:55:24 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" >
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:19 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > for me, this appears to be the offending commit:
> >
> > commit 5e82ea99827f6aa122fbb08f8659e76226ce107b (now testin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:03 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > The only missing detail is what connector is used for the display.
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:47:23 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > also, i just verified that i have a properly booting kernel based on
> > this commit:
> >
> > commit 58bbf018a70c56243
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:37:20 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > after suffering through the i915 "black screen" issue for a while,
> > it was a relief that it finally seemed to
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:37:20 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > after suffering through the i915 "black screen" issue for a while,
> > it was a relief that it finally seemed to
is this a new known issue? has anyone else seen this?
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.c
is this a new known issue? has anyone else seen this?
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.c
75 matches
Mail list logo
